Choice of Anesthesia Regimen Significantly Impacts Shunting and Diastolic Ventricular Function During Cardiac Catheterization

Author:

Healan SJ1,Staudt GE1,Nicholson GT1,Janssen 1,Doyle TP1,Smith HA1,McEachern WA1,Hill NE1,Lamb FS1

Affiliation:

1. Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Abstract

Abstract Background Most pediatric cardiac catheterizations are performed under general anesthesia, but few studies have examined how choice of anesthesia agent impacts hemodynamic data in pediatric patients. Our objective was to compare hemodynamics obtained under inhaled versus total intravenous anesthesia, and to determine if one more closely reflects the awake state. Methods Pediatric patients requiring percutaneous closure of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) or surveillance endomyocardial biopsy after orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) at Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt were enrolled. Each participant underwent hemodynamic assessment under inhaled volatile anesthesia (sevoflurane), and then under total intravenous anesthesia (dexmedetomidine and propofol) after a brief washout period. Paired data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon-signed rank test. Linear regression was used to analyze correlation between continuous variables. Results Twenty-five patients (13 OHT, 12 PDA) aged 6 months to 18 years were studied. Compared to baseline pre-procedure non-invasive blood pressure, systolic blood pressure was significantly lower under inhaled anesthesia versus intravenous anesthesia. Systemic vascular resistance was also significantly lower under inhaled anesthesia, while pulmonary vascular resistance was similar in both phases. In patients with a PDA, left-to-right shunting increased significantly under intravenous anesthesia versus inhaled. Similarly, in transplant patients, left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) increased following transition to intravenous anesthesia, with a positive correlation between the increase observed and the initial LVEDP under inhaled anesthesia. Conclusions Hemodynamics were impacted by the mechanism of general anesthesia. An intravenous anesthesia regimen may more closely reflect the awake, pre-catheterization state compared to inhaled volatile anesthesia.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3