Affiliation:
1. Queen Mary University of London
2. University of Sheffield
3. University of Leeds
4. University of Oxford
5. Imperial College London
6. The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Households in areas of socio-economic deprivation are more likely to consume diets low in fruit and vegetables. Fresh Street is a place-based fruit and vegetable voucher scheme with vouchers redeemable with local independent (non-supermarket) suppliers. Paper vouchers are offered to all households in a geographical area regardless of household type, size, or income with no requirement to demonstrate need. The regular shareable vouchers are combined with recipes and dietary information to increase exposure to healthy food prompts, reduce food insecurity, increase consumption of FV, improve dietary quality, and support healthy dietary habits.
This study aimed to inform a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the impact of Fresh Street on a range of public health outcomes.
Methods: The pilot cluster RCT took place in three inner city areas of high socioeconomic deprivation in England (Tower Hamlets, Bradford, and Doncaster). New systems for managing vouchers and doorstep delivering weekly envelopes to households were developed. Weekly envelopes containing vouchers (5 x £1), a healthy seasonal recipe and brief nutritional information were offered to all households in nine intervention streets. Nine control streets received no intervention. Household surveys collected information on fruit and vegetable consumption, diet quality, and household characteristics.
Results: The household survey response rate was below the 50% target for progression to the main trial. Most local fruit and vegetable vendors accepted vouchers. Three quarters or more of households regularly accepted the envelopes. The scheme was well received by households, local vendors and local public health teams. Household uptake of the scheme was highest in Tower Hamlets (75%) and Bradford (83%). The mean weekly voucher redemption was highest in Tower Hamlets (£3.26) and Bradford (£2.82), where the scheme ran longest, and where vendors were nearby.
Conclusions: This was the first pilot RCT of a place-based, household voucher approach. The newly developed system for securely printing and redeeming the vouchers worked well and is potentially scalable.
Future trials should address low household survey response rates and explore more efficient ways to deliver the intervention e.g. through collaborative working with local resources such as community centres.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. [i] WHO. FAO. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Geneva: World Health Organisation and Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.
2. [ii] FAO and WHO. SUSTAINABLE HEALTHY DIETS: guiding principles. Place of publication not identified. FOOD & AGRICULTURE ORG; 2019.
3. [iii] DEFRA. Food statistics pocketbook. GOV.UK, https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/food-statistics-pocketbook (2019, accessed 22 September 2022).
4. Food shoppers’ nutrition attitudes and relationship to dietary and lifestyle practices - ScienceDirect;[iv] Bowman S;Nutr Res,2005
5. Comparing Prices for Food and Diet Research: The Metric Matters;Jones NRV;J Hunger Environ Nutr,2016