E-learning Versus On-Site Learning: an Approach to Determining Medical Students’ Perceptions at King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences

Author:

Busaeed Reem1,Alghamdi Malak1,Abbas Aisha1,Altassan Faten1,Lamphon Raghad1,Saad Sereen1,Shuaib Suzan1,Khan Muhammad Anwar1

Affiliation:

1. King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences

Abstract

Abstract Background Recently, the world has faced the COVID-19 crisis that has forced the education sector to switch from on-site learning to online learning. Thus, the aim of the current study was to investigate students’ satisfaction, performance, and communication during online learning. Methods This research was a descriptive, cross-sectional study. The participants were fourth-year medical students studying the musculoskeletal and skin (MSKS) block online and the neuroscience and vision (NEUV) block on site at King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences/College of Medicine (KSAU-HS/COMJ) in the 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 academic years, respectively. We distributed two web-based questionnaires and obtained the students’ mean scores from the assessment unit. We collected qualitative and quantitative data and analysed it using descriptive statistics based on a chi-squared independent t-test. Results A total of 148 respondents completed the theoretical questionnaire, of which 35.1% were satisfied with the basic medical sciences (BMS) online course, and 26.35% believed that the online course material was easier to understand. The interaction among students and between students and instructors was much worse during the online courses (29.73% and 28.37%, respectively). We observed an association between gender and higher grade point average (GPA) online (p = .0164). For the second questionnaire, there were 120 participants. Although 68.33% of them were satisfied with online problem-based learning (PBL), 56.66% reported worse performance in online PBL. Of all the students, 74.16% preferred on-site practical sessions, and 66.6% believed that they performed better in on-site practical sessions. We identified a significant difference in the students’ mean scores (p < .0001). Conclusion This research revealed that the flexibility and convenience of online learning had a positive effect on students’ satisfaction. Our findings showed that a hybrid (online and on site) method can be used effectively in medical schools, but some aspects of the courses cannot be fully replaced by online learning.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference29 articles.

1. History and perspectives of e-learning;Hubackova S;Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences,2015

2. Nicholson PT. (2007c). A History of E-Learning. In Springer eBooks (pp. 1–11). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4914-9_1.

3. Can e-learning replace classroom learning?;Zhang D;Commun ACM,2004

4. WHO. (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/healthemergencies/coronavirus-covid-19.

5. Distance education: Advantages and disadvantages of the point of view of education and society;Oliveira MMS;Dialogia,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3