Typical Diagnostic Reference Levels of Common Indications for Computed Tomography Scans Among Adult Patients in Uganda: a Cross-sectional Study

Abstract

Abstract Background Medical exposure to ionizing radiation has increased due to an increase in the number of computerized tomography (CT) scan examinations performed. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommends indication-based diagnostic reference levels (IB-DRLs) as an effective tool that aids in optimizing CT scan radiation doses. In many low-income settings, there is a lack of IB-DRLs to support optimization of radiation doses. Objective To establish typical DRLs for common CT scan indications among adult patients in Kampala, Uganda. Methodology: A cross sectional study design was employed involving 337 participants enrolled from three hospitals using systematic sampling. The participants were adults who had been referred for a CT scan. The typical DRL of each indication was determined as the median value of the pooled distribution of CTDIvol (mGy) data and the median value of the pooled distribution of total DLP (tDLP)(mGy.cm) data from three hospitals. Comparison was made to anatomical, and indication based DRLs from other studies. Results 54.3% of the participants were male. The following were typical DRLs for: acute stroke (30.17mGy and 653mGy.cm); head trauma (32.04mGy and 878mGy.cm); interstitial lung diseases/ high resolution chest CT scan (4.66mGy and 161mGy.cm); pulmonary embolism (5.03mGy and 273mGy.cm); abdominopelvic lesion (6.93mGy and 838mGy.cm) and urinary calculi (7.61mGy and 975mGy.cm). Indication based total Dose Length Product (tDLP) DRLs was lower than tDLP DRLs of a whole anatomical region by 36.4% on average. Most of the developed typical IB-DLP DRLs were lower or comparable to values from studies in Ghana and Egypt in all indications besides urinary calculi while they were higher than values in a French study in all indications besides acute stroke and head trauma. Conclusion Typical IB-DRLs is a good clinical practice tool for optimization of CT doses and therefore recommended for use to manage CT radiation dose. The developed IB-DRLs varied from international values due to differences in selection of CT scan parameters and standardization of CT imaging protocols may narrow the variation. This study can serve as baseline for establishment of national indication-based CT DRLs in Uganda. *As a note, Kevina Nalwoga and John Mark Kasumba Mayanja are co-first authors.*