Affiliation:
1. OISE/University of Toronto
2. University of Toronto
3. Ontario Tech University
Abstract
Abstract
This scoping review updates scholars, educators, policymakers and the public up-to-date on the state of “disinformation literacy” suited to adult populations. We reviewed articles published between 2016–2022 that report on or provide recommendations for disinformation literacy interventions for adults. We found that intervention formats and evaluation methods were diverse and include course-, web-, or game-based interventions, public events, and visual resources. Studies on evaluated interventions outside of formal education were scarce. Experts recommended teaching about emotion targeting and regulation, algorithmic governance, lateral reading, visual technology, and in interactive formats that account for learners’ needs and context. Finally, we discovered debates around the usefulness of checklists and how to address politically sensitive issues, scepticism, and authority in programming. Future research and programming must attend to the needs of adult populations outside of formal education and draw upon librarians’ integral role in delivering community-based disinformation literacy programming.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference274 articles.
1. Albert AB, Emery JL, Hyde RC (2020) The proof is in the process: Fostering student
2. trust in government information by examining its creation Ref Serv Rev, 48(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-09-2019-0066
3. Alcolea-Díaz G, Reig R, Mancinas-Chávez R (2020) UNESCO’s media and information
4. literacy curriculum for teachers from the perspective of structural considerations of
5. information Comunicar: Media Educ Res J, 28(1)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献