Affiliation:
1. the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
2. The People’s Hospital of Yi Chun City
3. Harvard Medical School
4. Shanghai University of Sport
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The pathogenesis of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and the biomechanical influence following anterior cervical fusion (ACF) surgery with different number of fusion levels remains controversial. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of different numbers of fusion levels on adjacent segments and overall cervical kinematics.
Methods
From October 2018 to August 2020, patients who underwent ACF at our department were screened for enrollment in the study and divided into three groups based on the number of fusion levels: one-, two- and three-level. All subjects underwent pre- and post-operative cervical spine cone beam computed tomography(CBCT)scans at 7 functional positions. The range of motion (ROM) of the superior and inferior adjacent segments as well as the overall cervical, were measured using a 3D-3D registration technique. Changes in the pre- and post-operative ROMs were calculated for each patient. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the cervical spine stiffness scale, VAS and the JOA Scores.
Results
At the superior and inferior adjacent segment, the ROM of three-level were all greater than one-level during left-right bending and flexion-extension (p<0.05). The global ROM of three-level were significantly smaller than one-level during flexion-extension (p<0.05). The postoperative ROM of C4-C5 segment was significantly greater than that of C2-C3 (p<0.05) at flexion-extension. The post-operative VAS、JOA scores showed no significant differences between the three groups(p > 0.05). But the post-operative cervical spine stiffness scores of the three-level was higher than that of the one-level (p<0.05).
Conclusion
Three-level ACF had increased compensatory motion at the superior or inferior adjacent segments than one-level group at last follow-up and were probably to develop adjacent segment degeneration, which is more common in C4-C5 segment. Compared with the one-level fusion, the global ROM of the three-level decreased slightly and had little effect on the postoperative function of cervical spine.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy, arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy;Bohlman H;Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery-american Volume,1993
2. Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5- to 11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study;Yue WM;Spine,2005
3. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go? Spine;Schwab JS,2006
4. Assessment of adjacent-segment mobility after cervical disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with 1year's results;Nabhan A;European Spine Journal,2011
5. Adjacent-level degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion;Maldonado CV;European Spine Journal,2011