Racial and Ethnic Differences in Self-reported Satisfaction With Fertility Clinics and Doctors

Author:

Wang Ange1ORCID,Anderson-Bialis Jake,Morris Jerrine R.,Corley Jamie,Anderson-Bialis Deborah,Citro Lauren,Seegulam Muhammad Esa,Fujimoto Victor

Affiliation:

1. Stanford University School of Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To investigate if differences in self-reported satisfaction with fertility clinics and doctors differ by race/ethnicity. Study Design: We used cross-sectional survey data from FertilityIQ online questionnaires completed by patients receiving U.S. fertility care from July 2015 to December 2020. Univariate and multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses performed to assess association of race/ethnicity on patient reported clinic and physician satisfaction. Results: Our total sample size included 21,472 patients (15,986 Caucasian, 1,856 Black, 1,780 LatinX, 771 East Asian, 619 South Asian, 273 Middle Eastern, 187 Native American self-reported). When adjusting for all confounders (demographic and patient satisfaction), we found that Black patients rated their doctors more highly (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.04-1.62 p=0.022 logistic and Coef 0.082, 95% CI 0.013-0.15 p=0.02 linear), while other ethnic groups did not show significant differences compared to Caucasian patients. East Asians had borderline lower satisfaction with clinic satisfaction in logistic regression (OR 0.74 95% CI 0.55-1.00 p=0.05), while significant differences were not found for other ethnic groups for clinic satisfaction. Conclusions: In summary, some but not all minority groups differed in their self-reported perception of satisfaction with fertility clinic and doctors compared to Caucasian patients. Cultural differences towards surveys may contribute to some of these findings, and satisfaction by racial/ethnic group may also be modified by results of care.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3