Identifying Long COVID Definitions, Predictors, and Risk Factors using Electronic Health Records: A Scoping Review

Author:

Luke Rayanne Anderson1,Shaw George2,Clarke Geetha S.3,Mollalo Abolfazl4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. George Mason University

2. University of North Carolina at Charlotte

3. Stanford University

4. Medical University of South Carolina

Abstract

Abstract Objective Long COVID, or post-COVID condition, is characterized by a range of physical and psychological symptoms and complications that persist beyond the acute phase of the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19). However, this condition still lacks a clear definition. This scoping review explores the potential of electronic health records (EHR)-based studies to characterize long COVID. Methods We screened all peer-reviewed publications in the English language from PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until September 14, 2023. We identified studies that defined or characterized long COVID based on EHR data, regardless of geography or study design. We synthesized these articles based on their definitions, symptoms, and predictive factors or phenotypes to identify common features and analytical methods. Results We identified only 20 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, with a significant majority (n = 17, 85%) conducted in the United States. Respiratory conditions were significant in all studies, followed by poor well-being features (n = 17, 85%) and cardiovascular conditions (n = 14, 70%). Some articles (n = 8, 40%) used a long COVID-specific marker to define the study population, relying mainly on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes and clinical visits for post-COVID conditions. Among studies exploring plausible long COVID (n = 12, 60%), reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and antigen tests were the most common identification methods. The time delay for EHR data extraction post-test varied, ranging from four weeks to more than three months; however, most studies considering plausible long COVID used a waiting period of 28 to 31 days. Conclusion Our findings suggest a limited global utilization of EHR-derived data in defining or characterizing long COVID, with 60% of these studies incorporating a validation step. Future meta-analyses are essential to assess the homogeneity of results across different studies.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference47 articles.

1. Long covid—mechanisms, risk factors, and management;Crook H;bmj,2021

2. A perspective on the applications of furin inhibitors for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2;Devi KP;Pharmacological Reports,2022

3. The conundrum of ‘long-COVID-19: a narrative review;Garg M;International journal of general medicine,2021

4. A review of COVID-19 in relation to metabolic syndrome: obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia;Makhoul E;Cureus,2022

5. Cutler DM. The economic cost of long COVID: An update. Published online July. 2022.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3