Pharmacy Students' Insights on Assessment Tools and Their Predictive Value in Evaluating Clinical Competencies

Author:

Netere Adeladlew Kassie1,Sendekie Ashenafi Kibret1,Chanie Gashaw Sisay1,Belachew Eyayaw Ashete1

Affiliation:

1. University of Gondar

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction: The assessment of clinical competency models is tailored to evaluate the academic performance and organization capabilities and whether the purpose is formative or summative. Competency-based curriculum for pharmacy students, focusing on core competencies with formative and summative evaluations. This study aimed to explore pharmacy students’ insights on assessment tools and the predictive value in evaluating clinical competencies at the University of Gondar. Method A cross-sectional survey was conducted to explore the students' attitudes and insights towards assessment approaches in pharmacy education. Comparative descriptive was used in describing students' perception towards the assessment approaches and instruments utilized in the modularized competency-based curriculum for pharmacy students. A comparative repeated measure was conducted across multiple assessment instruments to evaluate perceived difficulty, fairness, degree of learning and preferred frequency of use, using the Friedman test. Result A total of 135 students approached, and 118 participated in this study (response rate 87.4%). About 64%) were regular and fifth-year clerkship undergraduate students. The formative assessment approach was perceived to enhance confidence (59%) and motivation to study (50%). Conversely, more than half (53%) of students reported that question-spotting was their primary strategy for preparing for written exams. Additionally, more than 47% believed that study materials required for written exams were excessive and they felt that module grades often overly rely on single, one-time written exams. Also, many students (68%) agreed with the utilization and objectivity of OSCE in assessing clinical competencies, they rated it as difficult to perform each OSCE. Conclusion This survey revealed students prefer formative assessments for improving performance, motivation, and confidence, while summative assessments determine grades through one-time exams. The OSCE is effective yet challenging for clinical competency assessment, guiding the selection of assessment methods and highlighting potential difficulties and acceptability of assessment approaches.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference36 articles.

1. An international review of the use of competency standards in undergraduate pharmacy education;Nash RE;Pharm Educ,2015

2. Towards a global competency framework;Bruno A;Am J Pharm Educ,2010

3. The second round of the PHAR-QA survey of competences for pharmacy practice;Atkinson J;Pharmacy,2016

4. Beyond Flexner: A New Model for Continuous Learning in the Health Professions;Miller BMM;Acad Med,2010

5. Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education;Lockyer J;Med Teach,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3