Affiliation:
1. West Virginia University
Abstract
Abstract
Subsurface hydrogen storage is necessary to shift towards sustainable and zero-emission energy technologies, but geochemical data on the suitability of different reservoirs for hydrogen storage are scarce. Studies on complex chemical dynamics of aqueous Fe2+ and H2 have partially quantified the degree of loss for hydrogen gas in the subsurface at different operating pressures of hydrogen. However, a consensus regarding their thermodynamic relationships is lacking. In this study, we have investigated the magnitude of variation of hydrogen partial pressure in the subsurface in the presence of various concentrations of dissolved Fe2+ through simulations. Observations imply that for considerably low partial pressures of hydrogen (~ 10 − 5 bars), a feature of many natural brines, decreasing activity of Fe2+ by an order of magnitude can reduce the initial partial pressure of hydrogen by 3–4 orders of magnitude within a few years, due to enhanced reductive dissolution of the oxides. When pH2 of injected hydrogen exceeds 10 − 2 bars, magnetite becomes dominant as a secondary phase after the reduction of primary Fe3+ oxides, leading to almost three orders of magnitude of H2 (gaseous) loss that is almost independent of variation in Fe2+ activity. Both processes are supplemented with a varying degree of Fe2+ increase in the aqueous phase, supporting the release of Fe2+ to the aqueous phase due to Fe3+ oxide dissolution. These results point towards the degree of formation of magnetite as a potential controller of brine chemistry that depends upon nucleation kinetics and a threshold partial pressure for injected H2 under low reservoir temperatures (50–100℃). These results directly apply to understanding the cycling of redox-controlled elements and injected hydrogen in subsurface aqueous systems.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference89 articles.
1. Mechanistic and kinetic study of pyrite-hydrogen interaction at low temperature using electrochemical techniques;Betelu S,2015
2. Bethke, C.M., 2022. Geochemical and Biogeochemical Reaction Modeling, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108807005
3. Bo, Z., Zeng, L., Chen, Y., Xie, Q., 2021. Geochemical reactions-induced hydrogen loss during underground hydrogen storage in sandstone reservoirs. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy Special Issue devoted to the 32nd International Conference ECOS 2019 46, 19998–20009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.116
4. Geochemical modeling of CO2 storage in deep reservoirs: The Weyburn Project (Canada) case study. Chem. Geol., CO2 geological storage: Integrating geochemical, hydrodynamical, mechanical and biological processes from the pore to the reservoir scale;Cantucci B,2009
5. The role of soluble Fe(III) in the cycling of iron and sulfur in coastal marine sediments;Carey E;Limnol. Oceanogr.,2005