Efficacy and safety of Chinese tonic medicines for treating sepsis or septic shock: a protocol for a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author:

Yang Rui1ORCID,Hu Cheng1,Zhuo Yuxin2,Wang Wen3,Tan Qingyuan1,Shen Yuxin1,Jiang Kun1,Sun Xin3,Xia Qing1,Deng Lihui1

Affiliation:

1. Sichuan University West China Hospital Department of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine

2. Sichuan University

3. West China Hospital of Sichuan University Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Center

Abstract

Abstract

Background Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction with high morbidity and mortality. Various studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of Chinese tonic medicines (CTMs) in treating sepsis or septic shock. However, trials direct comparing the efficacy and safety of different CTMs for sepsis or septic shock are still lacking. To identify the most optimal CTMs for treating sepsis or septic shock, we plan to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis of various CTMs used for sepsis or septic shock patients. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the efficacy and safety of CTMs for patients with sepsis or septic shock will be systematically searched in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP database from inception to November 2023. The quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias V.2.0. tool. The confidence of evidence will be evaluated through the CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis) web application. Primary outcomes include the delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (△SOFA) score at day 7 after interventions and 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes comprise delta serum lactate levels (△Lac) and delta mean arterial pressure (△MAP) at day 7 after interventions as well as total dose and duration of vasoactive drugs. Safety outcome includes adverse drug reactions or adverse drug events (ADRs/ADEs). The Bayesian network meta-analysis will be conducted using the “BUGSnet” package in R version 4.2.2. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values will be used to rank each treatment. Statistical inconsistency assessment, publication bias assessment, heterogeneity analysis, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis will be performed. Discussion This study will provide new insights into the efficacy and safety of various CTMs used in sepsis or septic shock patients, providing help for future clinical practice and research. Systematic review registration CRD42023482572

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference29 articles.

1. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3), JAMA;Mervyn S,2016

2. Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009–2014;Rhee Chanu D;JAMA,2017

3. Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis;Seymour Christopher W;N Engl J Med,2017

4. Recognizing Sepsis as a Global Health Priority—A WHO Resolution, New England Journal of Medicine;Konrad R;Mass Med Soc,2017

5. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock;Dellinger R;Intensive Care Med,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3