Fragmentation of Care in Breast Cancer: Greater than the Sum of its Parts

Author:

Freeman Hadley D.1,Burke Linnea C.1,Humphrey Ja’Neil G.2,Wilbers Ashley J.3,Vora Halley1,Khorfan Rhami1,Solomon Naveenraj L.1,Namm Jukes P.1,Ji Liang1,Lum Sharon S.1

Affiliation:

1. Loma Linda University Health

2. Loma Linda University

3. Washington University

Abstract

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fragmentation of care (FC, the receipt of care at > 1 institution) has been shown to negatively impact cancer outcomes. Given the multimodal nature of breast cancer treatment, we sought to identify factors associated with FC and its effects on survival of breast cancer patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of surgically treated, stage I-III breast cancer patients in the 2004–2020 National Cancer Database, excluding neoadjuvant therapy recipients. Patients were stratified into two groups: FC or non-FC care. Treatment delay was defined as definitive surgery > 60 days after diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors predictive of FC, and survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards methods. RESULTS: Of the 531,644 patients identified, 340,297 (64.0%) received FC. After adjustment, FC (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.25–1.29) was independently associated with treatment delay. Factors predictive of FC included Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01–1.07), treatment at comprehensive community cancer programs (OR 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03–1.08) and integrated network cancer programs (OR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.51–1.59), AJCC stage II (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.05–1.07) and stage III tumors (OR 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02–1.10), and HR+/HER2 + tumors (OR 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02–1.07). Treatment delay was independently associated with increased risk of mortality (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.20–1.26), whereas FC (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.86–0.88) showed survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: While treatment delay negatively impacts survival in breast cancer patients, our findings suggest FC could be a marker for multispecialty care that may mitigate some of these effects.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3