Patients’ motives and considerations on treatment decision-making for heavy menstrual bleeding: a qualitative study

Author:

Oderkerk T.J.1,Singotani R.G.2,Zuidema L.1,Hijden E.J.E.2,Geomini P.M.A.J.1,Bongers M.Y.1,Donker M.H.2

Affiliation:

1. Máxima Medical Center

2. VU University Amsterdam

Abstract

Abstract

Background Several treatment modalities for heavy menstrual bleeding are available. However, many women report being unsatisfied in their search for an appropriate and effective treatment. The aim of this study is to gain insights in the experienced impact of HMB and the motives and considerations of women during the decision-making process for different treatment options for heavy menstrual bleeding. Methods An interpretative qualitative study was performed, using in-depth interviews. In total, 14 semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients who consulted a physician for treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. Participants were recruited via the Dutch Patient Federation (N = 10) or via the outpatient clinic in the Máxima Medical Centre (N = 4). The interviews were conducted by phone or online between February 2020 and March 2021. In the interviews three topics were addressed: 1) participants experience with heavy menstrual bleeding, 2) patient experience with treatment journey and 3) elaborating on alternative treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding. A thematic content analysis was conducted. Results Fourteen participants aged between 30 and 59 years old were interviewed. Three main themes emerged; “Considerations in taking the first step to seek help”, “Various sources of information can contribute, confuse or frighten decision-making process” and “A physician’s support and understanding is needed to guide the decision-making process”. Conclusion Our results show that women's considerations and decision making strongly depend on the obtained information and experience, the relationship with the physician, the influence of the social environment, the pre-visit expectations/ desires, the fear of treatment complications and uncertainty of the effect of the treatment. It’s a physicians roll to create a trusting and open atmosphere during consultation. Patient-centered communication is helpful to share knowledge, and gain inside into a patient’s hopes, fears and worries.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference21 articles.

1. Practice. bulletin no. 128: diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-aged women. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2012;120(1):197–206.

2. Prevalence of heavy menstrual bleeding and experiences of affected women in a European patient survey;Fraser IS;Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2015

3. Perspectives of women experiencing Menorrhagia: A descriptive qualitative study;Kamaludin SAN;J Clin Nurs,2019

4. Progesterone or progestogen-releasing intrauterine systems for heavy menstrual bleeding;Lethaby A;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2015

5. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding;Beelen P;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3