Affiliation:
1. Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To investigated the prognostic value of temporal tumor response (TR) and plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA level changes at the end of radiotherapy (pRT0) and 3 months after radiotherapy (pRT3) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients.
Methods
A total of 651 patients with biopsy-proven NPC, treated with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, were retrospectively enrolled. TR and plasma EBV DNA levels were evaluated at pRT0 and pRT3. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint.
Results
Temporal change of tumor response (TRC) indicated that the refractory-disease group (where TR remained a non-complete response [non-CR] at pRT0 and pRT3) and slow-response group (where TR changed from non-CR to CR at pRT3) had a higher risk than the rapid-response group (where TR remained a CR at pRT0 and pRT3) in the 5-year locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS, P < 0.001). Temporal EBV DNA changes (EBV DNAC) indicated that patients with persistently detectable EBV DNA had the lowest 5-year distant metastasis-free survival rate (DMFS, P < 0.001). Our new risk classification (NRC) model combined TRC and EBV DNAC to classify the patients into three risk groups. High-risk and intermediate-risk patients had significantly lower 5-year PFS, overall survival, LRRFS, and DMFS than the low-risk patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that NRC was a significant independent prognostic factor for clinical outcomes, and this was also confirmed by time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analyses.
Conclusions
TRC was better in predicting locoregional recurrence. EBV DNAC was better in predicting distant metastasis after radiotherapy. NRC greatly improved the risk stratification in NPC patients.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. The diagnostic and prognostic values of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA for residual cervical lymphadenopathy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a retrospective study;Liu SL;Cancer Commun (Lond),2019
2. Chen YP, Chan ATC, Le QT, et al. Nasopharyng carcinoma Lancet. 2019;394:64–80.
3. How does intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy influence the treatment results in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients?;Lai SZ;Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2011
4. Management of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma;Lee AWM;Cancer Treat Rev,2019
5. Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: the Hong Kong experience;Kam MK;Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2004