Freedom From Infection (FFI): A paradigm shift towards evidence-based decision-making for malaria elimination.

Author:

Nelli Luca1ORCID,Surendra Henry2ORCID,Byrne Isabel3,Ahmad Riris4,Arisanti Risalia4,Lesmanawati Dyah4,Elyazar Iqbal5,Dumont Elin3,Drakeley Chris6ORCID,Wu Lindsey7ORCID,Matthiopoulos Jason1ORCID,Stresman Gillian8

Affiliation:

1. University of Glasgow

2. Eijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit

3. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

4. Universitas Gadjah Mada

5. Oxford University Clinical Research Unit Indonesia

6. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom

7. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

8. University of South Florida

Abstract

Abstract Background: Assessing elimination of malaria locally requires a surveillance system with high sensitivity and specificity to detect its presence without ambiguity. Currently, the absence of locally acquired cases for three consecutive years is used as confirmation of elimination. However, relying on routine health data to prove the absence of infection presents challenges, as even one missed case can lead to incorrect inferences and potential resurgence. Overcoming this challenge requires innovative approaches to model the coupled processes of malaria transmission and its clinical observation. Methods: We propose a novel statistical framework based on a state-space model to probabilistically demonstrate the absence of malaria, using routinely collected health system data (which is extensive but inherently imperfect). By simultaneously modelling the transmission dynamics within the population and the probability of detection, our approach was designed to provide a robust estimate of the surveillance system's sensitivity and the corresponding probability of local elimination (PFree). Findings: Our study reveals a critical limitation of the traditional criterion for declaring malaria freedom, highlighting its inherent bias and potential for misinterpreting ongoing transmission. Importantly, our research demonstrates the high sensitivity of this approach to observation biases, where even a single missed infection can lead to erroneous conclusions. We show that the traditional criterion can fail to identify ongoing transmission, even in the absence of reported cases. Interpretation: Our approach represents a significant advancement in programmatic decision-making and malaria interventions. This methodological advancement has far-reaching implications, not only for malaria control but also for infectious disease control in general. By enhancing surveillance systems and optimizing resource allocation, our approach creates opportunities to address the limitations of traditional criteria for declaring disease freedom. Our findings emphasize the urgent need to reassess existing methods to accurately confirm malaria elimination, and the importance of incorporating comprehensive modelling techniques to improve the design and implementation of surveillance systems, ultimately leading to more effective strategies for infectious disease control. The scalability and feasibility of our integrative modelling approach further support its potential to revolutionize surveillance systems and enhance public health outcomes. Funding: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference53 articles.

1. Nsubuga P, White ME, Thacker SB, Anderson MA, Blount SB, Broome CV, Chiller TM, Espitia V, Imtiaz R, Sosin D: Public health surveillance: a tool for targeting and monitoring interventions. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries 2nd edition 2006.

2. Freedom from Infection: Confirming Interruption of Malaria Transmission;Stresman G;Trends Parasitol,2017

3. A manual for veterinarians on the design and analysis of surveillance for demonstration of freedom from disease;FAO;FAO Animal Production and Health Manual No

4. A new probability formula for surveys to substantiate freedom from disease;Cameron AR,1998

5. Rapid assessment of rat eradication after aerial baiting;Samaniego-Herrera A;Journal of Applied Ecology,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3