Safety and Effectiveness of Multimodal Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Pain and Recovery after Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis

Author:

Cheng Lin1,Liu Jiang1,Qin Sifan1,Geng Xinyan1,Zhang Limin2,Fang Shirong2

Affiliation:

1. Weifang Medical University

2. Weifang People's Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Background Multimodal Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA), a new anesthetic strategy, is always controversial for relieving postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopy. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of OFA compared to conventional opioid anesthesia (OA) in postoperative pain management and recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Methods This systematic review is registered on PROSPER. The databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to September 2023. The study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were independently conducted by two reviewers. The primary outcomes included postoperative pain scores at 2h and 24h, postoperative analgesic consumption, Quality of recovery (QoR-40) scores, and the incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) and other complications. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0, and meta-analysis was carried out using random effects models. Results Ultimately, 12 studies involving 983 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were included in this systematic evaluation and meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that OFA significantly reduced early postoperative pain response in laparoscopic patients compared with conventional OA. OFA also reduced the incidence of PONV and the consumption of analgesics and antiemetics and improved the subjective quality of recovery in patients. The other variables presented no significant differences between the groups or were unable to be analyzed. Conclusions OFA may be more beneficial for postoperative pain management and recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional OA. Future studies could further extend these findings to other surgical populations.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference39 articles.

1. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy;Kim SS;JAMA,2018

2. Laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery;Scott-Conner CEH;Med Clin North Am,2002

3. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease;Aarts JW;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2015

4. Laparoscopic urinary stone surgery: an updated evidence-based review;Skolarikos A;Urol Res,2010

5. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis;Jaschinski T;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3