Affiliation:
1. Nursing and Chiropody Faculty of Valencia University
2. University of Turin and CPO Piemonte
3. Predepartamental Unit of Medicine of Universitat Jaume I
4. University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
5. Ministry of Health of the Basque Government, Sub-Directorate for Public Health and Addictions of Gipuzkoa
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Socioeconomic position (SEP) may have different effects on cognitive development and family context could play a role in this association. This work aimed to analyse the role of socioeconomic positions, measured via various indicators collected longitudinally, in cognitive development at 7–11 years of age, evaluating the role of family context as a potential mediator.
Method
The study sample included 394 and 382 children from the INMA Gipuzkoa and Valencia cohorts, respectively. SEP indicators were assessed during pregnancy (family social class, parental education, employment, and disposable income) and at 7 (Gipuzkoa) and 11 (Valencia) years of age (At Risk of Poverty or Social Exclusion (AROPE)). Family context and cognitive development were measured with the Haezi-Etxadi Family Assessment Scale 7–11 (HEFAS 7–11) and Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices (Raven’s CPM), respectively. Linear regression models were developed to assess the relationships between a) SEP-family context, b) SEP-cognitive development, and c) family context-cognitive development, adjusting for a priori-selected confounders. Simple and multiple mediation analyses were performed to explore the role of family context in the SEP-cognitive development relationship.
Results
Lower SEP was related with a lower cognitive score, this association being particularly robust for family social class. SEP indicators were related to subscales of family context, in particular those regarding cognitive stimulation, parental stress, and parenting. A relationship was also found between these three subscales and child cognitive development, mediating the effect of family social class on child cognition by 5.2, 5.5, and 10.8%, respectively, and 12.0% jointly.
Conclusions
Both family SEP and context contribute to a child’s cognitive development. Equalising policies and positive parenting programmes could contribute to improving cognitive development in children.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. American Psychological Association (APA) (2021) cognitive development – APA Dictionary of Psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/cognitive-development. Accessed 11 Nov 2021
2. Piaget’s Cognitive Developmental Theory: Critical Review;Babakr ZH;Educ Q Rev,2019
3. Berk LE (1998) Desarrollo del niño y del adolescente, 1a. Pearson Prentice Hall, Madrid
4. Interaction between Socioeconomic Status and Cognitive Development in Children Aged 7, 9, and 11 Years: A Cross-Sectional Study;Burneo-Garcés C;Dev Neuropsychol,2019
5. Dahlgren G, Whitehead M (2010) Estrategias europeas para la lucha contra las desigualdades sociales en salud: Desarrollando el máximo potencial de salud para toda la población - Parte 2 (publicado originalmente como Concepts and principles for tackling social inequities in health: Levelling up Part 2). Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social (originalmente publicado por la Oficina Regional de la OMS para Europa)