Y-90 PET/MR imaging optimization with a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood reconstruction algorithm

Author:

Calatayud-Jordán José1ORCID,Carrasco-Vela Nuria2,Chimeno-Hernández José3,Carles-Fariña Montserrat4,Olivas-Arroyo Consuelo1,Bello-Arqués Pilar1,Pérez-Enguix Daniel1,Martí-Bonmatí Luis1,Torres-Espallardo Irene1

Affiliation:

1. La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital Medical Imaging Clinical Area: Hospital Universitario La Fe Area Clinica de Imagen Medica

2. Hospital Clínic Universitari: Hospital Clinico Universitario

3. La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital: Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe

4. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe: Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe

Abstract

Abstract

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging after \(^{90}\) Y radioembolization is used for both lesion identification and dosimetry. Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithms are an alternative to ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) with improved image quality and lesion detectability. The investigation of optimal parameters for $^{90}$Y image reconstruction of Q.Clear, a commercial BPL algorithm developed by General Electric (GE), in PET/MR is a field of interest and the subject of this study. The NEMA phantom was filled at an 8:1 sphere-to-background ratio. Acquisitions were performed on a PET/MR scanner for clinically relevant activities between 0.7 - 3.3 MBq/ml. Reconstructions with Q.Clear were performed varying the \(\beta\) penalty parameter between 20 - 6000, the acquisition time between 5 - 20 min and pixel size between 1.56 - 4.69 mm. OSEM reconstructions of 28 subsets with 2 and 4 iterations with and without Time-of-flight were compared to Q.Clear with $\beta$ = 4000. Recovery coefficients (RC), their coefficient of variation (COV), background variability (BV), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and residual activity in the cold insert were evaluated. Increasing $\beta$ parameter lowered RC, COV and BV, while CNR was maximized at $\beta$ = 4000; further increase resulted in oversmoothing. For quantification purposes, $\beta$ = 1000 - 2000 could be more appropriate. Longer acquisition times resulted in larger CNR due to reduced image noise. Q.Clear reconstructions led to higher CNR than OSEM. A $\beta$ of 4000 was obtained for optimal image quality, although lower values could be considered for quantification purposes. An optimal acquisition time of 15 min was proposed considering its clinical use.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference72 articles.

1. M Santoro and G della Gala and G Paolani and F Zagni and S Civollani and S Strolin and L Strigari (2023) {A novel figure of merit to investigate 68Ga PET/CT image quality based on patient weight and lesion size using Q.Clear reconstruction algorithm: A phantom study}. Phys. Med. 106: 102523 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.102523, Elsevier BV, 1120-1797

2. BA Tafti and SA Padia (2019) {Dosimetry of Y-90 Microspheres utilizing Tc-99m SPECT and Y-90 PET}. Semin. Nucl. Med. 49(3): 211--217 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2019.01.005, Elsevier {BV}, may

3. J Yan and J Schaefferkoetter and M Conti and D Townsend (2016) A method to assess image quality for Low-dose {PET}: analysis of {SNR}, {CNR}, bias and image noise. Cancer Imaging 16(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-016-0086-0, Springer Science and Business Media {LLC}, aug

4. NJ Vennart and N Bird and J Buscombe and HK Cheow and E Nowosinska and S Heard (2017) Optimization of {PET}/{CT} image quality using the {GE} `{S}harp {IR}' point-spread function reconstruction algorithm. Nucl. Med. Commun. 38(6): 471--479 https://doi.org/10.1097/mnm.0000000000000669, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), jun

5. G Reyn{\'{e}}s-Llompart and C G{\'{a}}mez-Cenzano and JL Vercher-Conejero and A Sabat{\'{e}}-Llobera and M Calvo-Malvar and JM Mart{\'{\i}}-Climent (2018) {Phantom, clinical, and texture indices evaluation and optimization of a penalized-likelihood image reconstruction method (Q.Clear) on a {BGO} {PET}/{CT} scanner}. {M}ed. {P}hys. 45(7): 3214--3222 https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12986, Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3