Comparison of clinical outcomes among cancer patients treated in and out of clinical trials

Author:

Duenas Jose Alexander Carreno1,Sanchez Natalia2,Bonilla Carlos Eduardo2

Affiliation:

1. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología - Colombia

2. Centro de tratamiento e investigación sobre cáncer - CTIC

Abstract

Abstract Background. It is unknown if participation in a cancer clinical trial confers clinical benefits to patients. There is not enough scientific evidence in this regard and the available publications are scarce and provide ambiguous and limited information. Objective. Compare overall and progression-free survival and response to treatment among those who met the eligibility criteria and accepted to participate and those who refused to participate in cancer clinical trials. Methods. An observational cross-sectional study with an analytical component was carried out, which included patients diagnosed with cancer who participated in phase III clinical trials and patients who, being eligible, refused to participate. The patients were cared for at the National Institute of Cancerology in Colombia between 2019 and 2022. Analysis of differences in proportions and means of sociodemographic and clinical variables was included; overall survival and progression-free survival time were described and the survival curves between groups were compared. Variables related to survival were determined using a Cox regression model and Hazard Ratios were calculated. Results. 112 patients were included (51 participants and 61 refusers). Median progression-free survival for participants was 18.1 months (95%CI 14.0-22.2) vs 24.0 months (95%CI 16.4-31.5) in refusers p=0.23 and median overall survival for participants was 21.9 months (95CI % 17.6-26.1) vs refusers 33.2 months (CI95% 24.0-42.3), for the participating women it was 21.6 months (14.7-28.5 IC95%) vs refusers 22.7 months (9.3-36.0 IC95%) and for the group of participating men was 16.7 months (14.3-19.1 IC95%) and for refusers 32.4 months (25.5-39.3 IC95%). In the Cox proportional hazards model, only ECOG 1 was a better predictor of survival HR 0.48 (95%CI 0.23-0.97) p=0.042. Conclusion. This investigation found that participation in a clinical trial regarding rejection was associated with improved response rates, with no significant difference in overall or progression-free survival outcomes.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference29 articles.

1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Vol. 312, BMJ (Clinical research ed.). England; 1996. p. 71–2.

2. Institute NC. Cancer Clinical Trials [Internet]. 2022. Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Information/clinical-trials

3. Association between progression-free survival and patients’ quality of life in cancer clinical trials;Hwang TJ;Int J cancer

4. Commissioning support for London. A model of care for cancer services Clinical paper. London; 2010.

5. Endpoints in cancer clinical trials;Fiteni F;J Visc Surg

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3