Central desks as an approach for health governance in conflict settings – case studies from northwest Syria

Author:

Aref Maher Al1,Zoubi Zedoun Al2,Khalil Munzer Al1,Abdulla Orwa Al3,Ekzayez Abdulkarim4

Affiliation:

1. R4HSSS

2. Union for Medical and Relief Organizations

3. Strategic Research Centre Oz SRC

4. King’s College London

Abstract

Abstract Background: The conflict in Syria affected severely the health sector; health infrastructure was damaged, the Damascus ministry of health withdrew from opposition held areas, health workers fled the country, and there has been always a shortage of funding and medical supplies. To address these needs, Syrian NGOs, INGOs, donors, and UN Agencies have been providing health interventions through humanitarian channels. However, many of these interventions were short termed, and there was no governance framework to guide the newly introduced parallel system, leaving it subject to individual organizations’ strategies and approaches. To counter these challenges, local communities and Syrian NGOs established new platforms to govern and coordinate certain aspects of the health sector. These platforms are called “central desks”, which are perceived to be independent and neutral structures and can coordinate services between all actors. Examples of these structures are Syrian Immunization Group (SIG), Health Information System (HIS), the Infection Protection and Control initiative (IPC), and the Referral System network. Methods: The research was based on an institutional approach to governance as presented by (Abimbola et. Al, 2017) and (Baez-Carmago and Jacobs, 2011) of health governance. We have investigated the central desks across the main themes; governance inputs of these central desks, such as strategic vision and legitimacy; governance processes, such as accountability and transparency, and governance outcomes, such as effectiveness and efficiency. Further to intensive literature review, eight focus group discussion were conducted, average pf 12 participants. Key themes then were deducted and coded. The qualitative analysis was done using NVIVO 12 software. Conclusion: Central desks, that are not part of national ministries of health, are new innovative approaches that can increase the efficiency of health interventions in conflict settings. The detailed features of such desks should be context specific and locally informed and led.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference36 articles.

1. Guinto R, #DecolonizeGlobalHealth. Rewriting the narrative of global health internationalhealthpolicies.org/blogs/decolonizeglobalhealth-rewriting-the-narrative-of-global-health/ blog [Internet]. International Health Policies. 2019 [cited 2022 Jul 5]. Available from: https://www.internationalhealthpolicies.org/blogs/decolonizeglobalhealth-rewriting-the-narrative-of-global-health/.

2. Holst J. Global Health – emergence, hegemonic trends and biomedical reductionism. Global Health [Internet]. BioMed Central; 2020. [cited 2022 Jul 5];16. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7201392/.

3. Pyone T, Smith H, van den Broek N. Frameworks to assess health systems governance: a systematic review. Health Policy Plan [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2017 [cited 2022 Aug 31];32:710. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5406767/.

4. Abimbola S, Negin J, Martiniuk AL, Jan S. Institutional analysis of health system governance. Health Policy Plan [Internet]. Health Policy Plan; 2017 [cited 2022 Aug 31];32:1337–44. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28981658/.

5. Papanicolas I, Rajan D, Karanikolos M, Soucat A, Figueras J. 1959-. Health system performance assessment a framework for policy analysis.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3