Patterns of balancing and compensating primary tooth extractions amongst paediatric dentists

Author:

Nalbantoglu Eser1,Singh Parmjit2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Biruni University, Faculty of Dentistry

2. College of Medicine and Dentistry

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction: Balancing and compensating extractions (BCEs) of primary teeth aims to minimize the development of more severe malocclusions and reduce the need for subsequent complex orthodontic treatment. Purpose: To assess the demographics, practice characteristics, and clinical preferences of United Kingdom (UK) paediatric dentists for BCEs of primary teeth, to determine adherence to national clinical guidelines and whether paediatric dentists refer patients to orthodontists before deciding on BCEs. Methods: This was a total population online survey of members of the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry (BSPD). A pre-tested, self-administered electronic questionnaire was accessed through a secure website. Questions offered frequency options (always/frequently, often/sometimes and rarely/never) for a range of clinical scenarios in patients up to 5 years and those between 6 and 9 years. Descriptive statistics in the form of percentages were presented. To compare single population/sample percentages, a Pearson Chi-square goodness-of-fit (GOF) test with post hoc pairwise binomial analysis and Bonferroni adjustments was performed. Results: Of the 288 specialists invited, 67 (23.3%) completed the questionnaire. Respondents were mostly female (n=55; 82.1%), with most respondents working in secondary care (n=51; 77.3%). The majority (n=54; 81.8%) supported the application of guidelines for primary teeth extractions. Thirty-nine paediatric dentists (58.2%) always/frequently encountered BCEs, with 29 (46.2%) performing BCEs in over 40 patients in the past year. Forty respondents (59.7%) reported always/frequently complying with national clinical guidelines for primary teeth extractions. Data from 65 respondents indicates that 83.6% (n=56) rarely/never made referrals to an orthodontist, whilst 65.7% (n=44) rarely/never consulted an orthodontist (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The results reveal significant decision variation across clinical scenarios, with good adherence to guidelines in BCEs of primary teeth among paediatric dentists. However, there is limited interdisciplinary collaboration, as indicated by the infrequent referrals or consultations with orthodontists when considering BCEs of primary teeth.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference26 articles.

1. Primary canine and molar relationships in centric occlusion in 3- to 6-year-old children: A cross-sectional survey;Kumar D;Int J Clin Pediatr Dent,2019

2. Does the premature loss of primary anterior teeth cause morphological, functional and psychosocial consequences?;Nadelman P;Braz Oral Res,2021

3. Premature loss of deciduous teeth as a symptom of systemic disease: A narrative literature review;Spodzieja K;Int J Environ Res Public Health,2022

4. Reasons for extraction in primary teeth among 5–12 years school children in Haryana, India: A cross-sectional study;Bansal M;J Clin Exp Dent,2017

5. Children’s Dental Health Survey 2013. Country Specific Report: England. Health and Social Care Information Centre. Online information available at: https://files.digital.nhs.uk/publicationimport/pub17xxx/pub17137/cdhs2013-england-report.pdf (accessed 20 May 2024).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3