Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
2. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Nursing. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
3. The University of Melbourne, Australia
4. University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
5. Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences
6. Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Physiotherapy provides non-invasive and non-pharmaceutical intervention for curative, rehabilitation and preventative purposes. Physiotherapy is also a central provider of health promotion. As the global burden of non-communicable diseases and chronic health conditions is rising, the importance of physiotherapy services increases. Unfortunately, physiotherapy services in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are generally unsatisfactory. In Nepal, the earthquake in 2015 and the COVID pandemic have clearly illuminated the importance of physiotherapy.
Objective: This qualitative study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators at different system levels for strengthening physiotherapy services in Nepal.
Methods: Forty semi-structured individual interviews were performed with different health providers. Transcribed interviews were assessed with thematic analysis. A five-level socioecological framework conceptualised multilevel determinants of barriers and facilitators.
Results: The study revealed various factors that were potential barriers and facilitators across five different levels, namely individual (taking the lead, need for advocacy), interpersonal (lack of recognition and autonomy, networking for referrals and coordination), community (lack of knowledge and awareness, social and family support), organisational (accessibility, workplace and clinical practice, educational opportunities, role of organisations and rehabilitation centres), and public policy level (planning and implementation of policies and programs, medical hegemony, priorities). Government officials, local leaders, and clinicians, half of whom were physiotherapists, agreed on many of the same issues, where a lack of awareness of what physiotherapy is and knowledge about what physiotherapists do was central.
Conclusions: The results provide information for the development of physiotherapy by pointing out key elements that need attention, which are applicable to the situation in most LMIC countries where special focus needs to be directed towards rural and remote areas.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference74 articles.
1. Health system's readiness to provide cardiovascular, diabetes and chronic respiratory disease related services in Nepal: analysis using 2015 health facility survey;Ghimire U;BMC Public Health,2020
2. Nepal Health Update NHPC registered professionals [18 March, 2024]. https://publichealthupdate.com/nepal-health-professional-council-nhpc/
3. The First Physical Therapy Summit on Global Health: implications and recommendations for the 21st century;Dean E;Physiother Theory Pract,2011
4. Introduction to Special Issue: A Review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and Physical Therapy over the Years;Escorpizo R;Physiother Res Int,2015
5. World Health Organisation (WHO). A Practical Manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) (2013) https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/how-to-use-the-icf---a-practical-manual-for-using-the-international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health