The diagnostic efficiency and safety of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy using 1.1-mm cryoprobe in diagnosing interstitial lung disease

Author:

Bian Yiding1,Deng Mingming2,Gao Qian2,Zhou Guowu2,Tong Run2,Zhao Ling2,Liu Min2,Sun Jie3,Dai Huaping2,Herth Felix JF4,Hou Gang2,Wang Chen1

Affiliation:

1. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College

2. China-Japan Friendship Hospital

3. Northeastern University

4. University of Heidelberg

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) is increasingly used to diagnose interstitial lung disease (ILD). The 1.1-mm cryoprobe has recently been available in clinical practice. The diagnostic yield and safety of TBLC using a 1.1-mm cryoprobe need to be confirmed. Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted in patients with suspected ILD and randomly assigned to 1.1-mm and 1.9-mm cryoprobe groups. The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield of multidisciplinary discussion (MDD). Secondary outcomes were sample quality and incidence of complications. The tension and stress effects during TBLC onto the target lobe caused by 1.1-mm, 1.9-mm, and 2.4 mm cryoprobes were also evaluated using finite element analysis. Results:A total of 224 patients were enrolled. No significant differences were observed in the diagnostic yield (80.4% vs. 79.5%, p=0.845) and sample quality scores (5.73±0.64 vs. 5.66±0.77; p=0.324) between the 1.9-mm cryoprobe group and 1.1-mm cryoprobe group. The average surface areas of samples in 1.1-mm cryoprobe group were smaller, while no difference in sample weights was observed. A decreased incidence of moderate bleeding was found in the 1.1-mm cryoprobe group (17.0% vs. 6.2%, p=0.027), while the incidence of pneumothorax was higher in the 1.1-mm cryoprobe group but did not reach statistical significance (1.8% vs. 7.1%, p=0.070). In finite element analysis, the 1.1-mm cryoprobe required the largest tension and produced the largest stress. Conclusion:Compared with a 1.9-mm cryoprobe, there was no difference in specimen quality or diagnostic rate but smaller sample size with a 1.1-mm cryoprobe. Trail registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04047667; registered August 4, 2019

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3