User-engagement in digital health applications: a scoping review

Author:

AKTAS Melek1,CAMBON Linda1,AROMATARIO Olivier1

Affiliation:

1. University of Bordeaux

Abstract

Abstract Background Participation has moved from political protest to active engagement in a number of areas health. Patient engagement has transformed healthcare, and mHealth has put mobile technology at the service of health promotion. Research links user engagement to effective interventions. This review aims to understand the attributes, methods and barriers to this user engagement in mHealth. Methods This scoping review used a systematic approach to map the evidence on mHealth interventions for health promotion and prevention in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed databases were searched using keywords appropriate to each database. A two-stage selection process was used and the analysis focused on attributes of participation, methods of engagement and barriers/facilitators. Results The study analysed mHealth interventions for health promotion and prevention. From 1,533 articles, 782 were obtained and 41 were selected for analysis on the basis of pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. There are different definitions and attributes of engagement, depending on the discipline and the author. There are also scales and gradations of engagement that qualify engagement according to its intensity or within the mHealth tool. User engagement methods included theory-based interventions, behaviour change techniques, user-centred design, personalisation, autonomy, peer support, motivation and gamification. Challenges included barriers to technology adoption, lack of theory-based interventions, personalisation, autonomy, peer support, motivation and gamification. Conclusion The current understanding of user participation in digital interventions reveals complexity and diversity, lacking consensus. Definitions vary among intervention providers, reflecting distinct objectives and methodologies. The absence of clear concepts and attributes emphasizes the need to refine definitions in digital health, guiding intervention evaluation and development methodologies.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference77 articles.

1. Arnstein SR. (1969). Citizen Participation is citizen power.

2. Cooke B, Kothari U, editors. Participation: The new tyranny? Zed books; 2001.

3. Unpacking ‘Participation’: models, meanings and practices;Cornwall A;Commun Dev J,2008

4. Bresson M. (2014). La participation: un concept constamment réinventé. Analyse sociologique des enjeux de son usage et de ses variations. Socio-logos. Revue de l'association française de sociologie, (9).

5. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients;Coulter A;BMJ,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3