Endorsement of N95 Respirators on Twitter: is correct, complete advice being given?

Author:

Ahmed Wasim1,Khan M. Laeeq2,Malik Aqdas3,Krishnan Satish4,Katz Matthew S5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Stirling

2. Ohio University

3. Sultan Qaboos University

4. Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode

5. Department of Radiation Medicine, Lowell General Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Research Objective This study aimed to examine influential voices recommending N95 respirators during a peak in cases and deaths. Our study sought to understand whether influencers were providing accurate details about the correct type of N95 that would protect the wearer and those around them and the vital need to ensure a proper fit for the N95. Study Design Our study drew upon primary data from Twitter and retrieved n = 251,740 tweets from January 2021, which were filtered and analysed using social network analysis. The study drew upon mixed methods. Betweenness centrality was used to identify influential users recommending N95 face masks. A coding frame was developed to determine whether complete advice was provided. The tweets received as replies to each of the influencers were analysed using content analysis. Principal Findings Our study found that the most influential users recommending about N95 face masks were medical professionals and public health experts. Moreover, our data revealed that most tweets by health influencers recommending N95s did not provide further details about the correct type of N95 mask and the vital need to ensure a proper fit for the mask. Implications for Policy and Practice Healthcare influencers can play a vital role in disseminating accurate and timely information. Our study confirmed that prominent health influencers were not providing enough information about N95s. We produce three key recommendations for healthcare influencers. Our results are likely to be of interest to health services and for improving patient safety.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference33 articles.

1. Adolph, C., Amano, K., Bang-Jensen, B., Fullman, N., Magistro, B., Reinke, G., & Wilkerson, J. (2020). Governor partisanship explains the adoption of statewide mandates to wear face coverings. MedRxiv.

2. COVID-19 and the 5G conspiracy theory: social network analysis of Twitter data;Ahmed W;Journal of medical internet research,2020

3. Bai, N. (2020). Still confused about masks? Here's the science behind how face masks prevent Coronavirus. Patient Care, 26.

4. Governing in a polarised era: Federalism and the response of U.S. state and federal governments to the COVID-19 pandemic;Birkland TA;Publius: The Journal of Federalism,2021

5. The online anti-vaccine movement in the age of COVID-19;Burki T;The Lancet Digital Health,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3