Reliability and relationship of colposcopical, cytological and hystopathological findings in the diagnostic process

Author:

Milenkovic Vera1,Sparic Radmila1,Dotlic Jelena1,Tulic Lidija1,Mirkovic Ljiljana1,Milenkovic Svetlana1ORCID,Atanackovic Jasmina1

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Centre of Serbia, Clinic for Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Belgrade

Abstract

Background/Aim. The question about the accuracy of cytology and colposcopy is more and more asked due to false positive and negative findings on the basis of which the decision on biopsy is made. The aim of this study was to examine reliability of biopsies based only on abnormal colposcopical findings, before receiving the results of Papanicolaou (PA) smear, by comparing findings of colposcopical, cytological and histopathological (HP) examinations as well as determining validity of these diagnostic methods. Methods. The study involved all patients who had their regular colposcopical and cytological examinations in the outpatient department during a two-year period (2009-2010) in the Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade. The material for HP examination was obtained by colposcopically directed biopsy, due to abnormal colposcopical findings and without waiting for PA smear results. The data obtained by these methods were statistically analyzed and compared. Furthermore, validity of colposcopical and cytological examinations was assessed. Results. Out of 127 patients highly significantly more patients had more malignant cervical changes on colposcopical exam compared to HP (p = 0.000), and cytological exam (p = 0.000). Highly significantly more patients had more malignant cervical changes on PA smear than HP exam (p = 0.000), unless when findings were assessed in the widest sense of benign and malignant changes when there were no significant differences in these findings (p = 0,450). Sensitivity of colposcopy as a diagnostic method was 87.5%, specificity 24.14%, positive predictive value (+PV) was 34.65% and negative predictive value (-PV) 80.77%. Sensitivity of PA smear as a diagnostic method was 62.5%, specificity 87.36%, +PV was 69.44%, and -PV 83.52%. Conclusion. Regarding the results of our study it is best to make a decision on treatment according to findings of all the three methods. Cytological analysis is more reliable than colposcopical examination. Therefore, it is advisable that following abnormal colposcopical findings, PA smear should always be taken and only after receiving the results further diagnostics can be planned (biopsy and HP). A final decision on the therapy has to be made based on HP findings which are the only method that can give the ultimate reliable diagnosis of cervical changes.

Publisher

National Library of Serbia

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3