Affiliation:
1. University of Belgrade, Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade
2. University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Clinic of Hematology, Lymphoma Center
3. University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Clinic of Hematology, Lymphoma Center + University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade
Abstract
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified, is the most common
type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma worldwide, accounting for 30-40% of all
lymphomas. It represents a collection of morphologically, genetically and
clinically different diseases. Therefore, it can be subdivided into
morphological variants, phenotypic subtypes, and molecular or genetic
categories. More recently, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma has witnessed
advances in molecular profiling and treatment of patients with refractory
and relapsed disease. The optimal management requires integrated
morphological and immunophenotypic analysis of cell and tissue, along with
chromosome and molecular analyses. Double-expressor lymphoma, defined as
overexpression of MYC and BCL2 proteins not related to underlying
chromosomal rearrangements, accounts for 20% to 30% of Diffuse large B-cell
lymphoma cases. In the latest, 5th edition of the World Health Organization
Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors-lymphoid neoplasms, double-expressor
lymphoma is not defined as an independent entity, but it has been proven to
be a marker for poor outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, the
degree of adverse prognosis is lesser than in double-hit lymphomas. Although
double-expressor lymphoma feature is confirmed as adverse prognostic marker
for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients, currently no sufficient data is
available to support treatment intensification over standard rituximab,
cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone regimen.
Well-designed randomized clinical trials are mandatory in order to properly
respond to this substantial clinical dispute.
Publisher
National Library of Serbia