Attitude towards the risk-based approach implementation into the russian healthcare system among employees of medical organizations

Author:

Russkikh S. V.1ORCID,Tarasenko E. A.1ORCID,Vasilieva T. P.2ORCID,Moskvicheva L. I.3ORCID,Gabunia N. Yu.4ORCID,Makarova E. V.5ORCID,Dvornikova T. A.2ORCID,Putilina E. A.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health; National Research University “Higher School of Economics”

2. N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health

3. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – Вranch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of Minzdrav of Russia

4. National Research University “Higher School of Economics”; Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

5. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of Minzdrav of Russia

Abstract

Aim of the study was to develop recommendations for improving procedures and unifying the content of risk management of the healthcare system to preserve public health based on an analysis of the opinions of doctors, organizers and experts of the healthcare system. Material and methods. As part of a quantitative online survey conducted from September to December, 2022, 104 respondents working in the healthcare system of the Russian Federation were interviewed. Additionally, 6 in-depth interviews were conducted with the organizers and experts of the healthcare sector as part of a qualitative sociological study. Desk research included analysis of scientific literature, and the regulatory framework related to the introduction of a risk-based approach to healthcare. Results and discussion. The article presents an analysis the perception of risks in healthcare by doctors, organizers and experts at the level of a medical organization, of the healthcare system and of public health (macro level), with the identification and classification of the main risk groups, on the basis of which risk-management’ measures can be built. The results of the study testify to the insufficiently deep introduction of risk management into the management system of medical organizations. The half of the respondents noted the low and extremely low level of risk management principles’ usage in their own organizations (50 % of respondents) and in Russian medical organizations in general (58.6 % of respondents). At the same time, from a third to a half of the participants found that it was difficult to answer about risk management implementation in their organizations, due to the lack of a unified methodology, imperfection of standards and quality control system of this set of measures, lack of specialists who could manage risks, lack of educational activities. To introduce a systematic approach to the unification of risk management processes, it is necessary to develop and approve the methodology of best practices, as well as take care of the training of specialists. Conclusions. In order to implement a systematic approach to the unification of risk management processes, it is necessary to develop and approve a methodology of best practices, as well as to take care of the training of specialists. It is imperative that hospital managers and staff focus on improving the organizational culture of patient safety management as the basis for their mission to preserve public health. It is necessary to continue further research in this direction in order to develop a strategy for countering risks at the level of public health as a medical and social resource of society.

Publisher

Institute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS

Reference44 articles.

1. Ferdosi M., Rezayatmand R., Molavi Taleghani Y. Risk management in executive levels of healthcare organizations: insights from a scoping review. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy. 2020;13:215–243. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S231712

2. Ivantsova M.A., Palevskaya S.A., Grenkova T.A., Prudnikov M.I., Vaganova N.A., Vozzhaev A.V., Stolin A.V. Methods of risks evaluation and management in healthcare and options of their practical usage in endoscopy. Ural’skiy meditsinskiy zhurnal = Ural Medical Journal. 2019;(11):29–40. [In Russian].

3. Zavrazhskii A.V. Features of classification of risks of medical organizations. Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekonomika = Theoretical and Applied Economics. 2017;(3):90–105. [In Russian].

4. Piasecki J., Dranseika V. Balancing professional obligations and risks to providers in learning healthcare systems. J. Med. Ethics. 2019;medethics-2019-105658. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105658

5. Westermann C., Peters C., Lisiak B., Lamberti M., Nienhaus A. The prevalence of hepatitis C among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup. Environ. Med. 2015;72(12):880–888. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2015-102879

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3