The role of minimally invasive technologies in the diagnosis and treatment of adhezive intestinal obstruction

Author:

Yusubov I. A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Azerbaijan State Institute of Improvement of doctors named after A. Aliyev

Abstract

One of the serious intra-abdominal complications after surgery is intestinal obstruction of adhesion origin (IOAO). Mortality during postoperative intestinal obstruction is 16.2–52.5 %. Aim of the study – laparoscopic diagnosis of IOAO in the early postoperative period and optimization of adhesiolysis.Material and methods. In the early postoperative period 70 patients with IOAO of upper gastrointestinal tract were examined and treated; laparoscopic operation was performed to 46 patients (the main group), an open method (laparotomy) – to 24 patients (the control group).Results and discussion. It was revealed that upper-middle and lower-middle incision laparotomies are more likely to cause intestinal obstruction. The sensitivity of preoperative ultrasound diagnosis of movable visceroparietal adhesions of small intestinal loops is 94.6 %, and the sensitivity of laparoscopic diagnosis is 99.2 %. When using minimally invasive technology, the frequency of intraoperative (4 (8.7 %) and 8 (33.3 %), respectively, p < 0.05) and postoperative complications (5 (10.9 %) and 13 (54.1 %), p < 0.05), mortality (0 and 4 (16.6 %), p < 0.05) and length of stay in hospital (5.7 (3–8) and 14.3 (10–17) days, p < 0,05) was less compared to laparotomy.Conclusions. Using of laparoscopic adhesiolysis and anti-adhesion barrier is appropriate in patients with I-II grade adhesion process. In cases where technical difficulties arise during laparoscopic adhesiolysis, it is more pathogenetically justified to separate adhesions by passing through a mini-laparotomy incision. If this is not possible, it is advisable to perform complex anti-adhesion measures, including conversion to laparotomy and systemic enzymotherapy after adhesiolysis.

Publisher

Institute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS

Subject

General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Reference13 articles.

1. Sallinen V., di Saverio S., Haukijärvi E., Juusela R., Wikström H., Koivukangas V., Catena F., Enholm B., Birindelli A., Leppäniemi A., Mentula P. Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis for adhesive small bowel obstruction (LASSO): an international, multicentre, randomised, open-label trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;4(4):278–286. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30016-0

2. Park J.H., Kim D.J., Park J.H. Does laparoscopic adhesiolysis reduce the risk of small bowel obstruction related readmissions and reoperations compared to open adhesiolysis? J. Minim. Invasive Surg. 2020;23(2):86–92. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2020.23.2.86

3. Kelly K.N., Iannuzzi J.C., Rickles A.S., Garimella V., Monson J.R.T., Fleming F.J. Laparotomy for small-bowel obstruction: first choice or last resort for adhesiolysis? A laparoscopic approach for small-bowel obstruction reduces 30-day complications. Surg. Endosc. 2014;28(1):65–73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3162-6

4. Sushkov O.I., Shakhmatov D.G., Moskalev A.I., Shunin E.M. Peritoneal adhesiolysis for end colostomy takedown (review). Koloproktologiya = Coloproctology. 2022;21(3):111–118. [In Russian]. doi: 10.33878/2073-7556-2022-21-3-111-118

5. Krielen P., di Saverio S., Broek R.T., Renzi C., Zago M., Popivanov G., Ruscelli P., Marzaioli R., Chiarugi M., Cirocchi R. Laparoscopic versus open approach for adhesive small bowel obstruction, a systematic review and meta-analysis of short term outcomes. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;88(6):866–874. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002684

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3