History and Politics of Medication Abortion in the United States and the Rise of Telemedicine and Self-Managed Abortion

Author:

Baker Carrie N.1

Affiliation:

1. Smith College

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the decades-long campaign to increase access to abortion pills in the United States, including advocates' work to win US Food and Drug Administration approval of mifepristone and misoprostol for abortion, the continuing restrictions on mifepristone, and the multiple strategies advocates have pursued to challenge these restrictions, including lobbying the FDA to remove the restrictions, obtaining a limited research exemption from FDA restrictions, and suing the FDA during the COVID-19 pandemic. The article pays particular attention to the influence of research conducted on the safety and efficacy of medication abortion as well as research on the impact of increased availability of abortion pills through telemedicine during the pandemic. The article also addresses self-managed abortion, wherein people obtain and use mifepristone and/or misoprostol outside the formal health care system, and it documents the growing network of organizations providing logistical, medical, and legal support to people self-managing abortion. The article concludes with reflections on the role abortion pills might play in the post-Roe era amid increasingly divergent abortion access trends across different regions of the United States.

Publisher

Duke University Press

Subject

Health Policy

Reference63 articles.

1. ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union). 2017. “Chelius v. Azar.” https://www.acluhi.org/en/cases/chelius-v-azar (accessed March232023).

2. ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union). 2021. “American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. US Food and Drug Administration.” February12. https://www.aclu.org/cases/american-college-obstetricians-and-gynecologists-v-us-food-and-drug-administration.

3. ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union). 2022. “Potential Legal Flaws in State Restrictions Targeting Mifepristone.” https://www.aclu.org/other/potential-legal-flaws-state-restrictions-targeting-mifepristone (accessed March23, 2023).

4. ACOG (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists). 2020. “COVID-19 FAQs for Obstetrician–Gynecologists, Gynecology.” https://www.acog.org/clinical-information/physician-faqs/covid-19-faqs-for-ob-gyns-obstetrics (accessed March23, 2023).

5. Effectiveness, Safety, and Acceptability of No-Test Medical Abortion (Termination of Pregnancy) Provided Via Telemedicine: A National Cohort Study;Aiken;BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,2021

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3