What Doctors Want: A Comment on the Financial Preferences of Organized Medicine

Author:

Perera Isabel M.1

Affiliation:

1. Cornell University

Abstract

Abstract Organized medicine's persistent demand for high payments is one factor that contributes to the rising costs of health care. The profession's long-standing preference for private and fee-for-service practice has pressured payers to increase reimbursement rates in fee-based systems; and it has stalled, thwarted, or otherwise co-opted attempts to contain costs in other payment systems. Yet what doctors want in fact varies. This article revisits classic comparative studies of organized medicine in advanced democracies to highlight two underemphasized findings: (1) physicians' financial preferences can deviate from traditional expectations, and (2) the structure of the organizations that represent doctors can shape whether and how those preferences are expressed. These findings remain relevant today as a discussion of contemporary American health politics illustrates.

Publisher

Duke University Press

Subject

Health Policy

Reference58 articles.

1. AMA (American Medical Association). 2015. “How Physicians Are Paid.” August 25. www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/payment-delivery-models/how-physicians-are-paid.

2. AMA (American Medical Association). 2019a. “House of Delegates Reference Manual: Procedures, Policies, and Practices.” November. www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2019-11/hod-reference-manual.pdf.

3. AMA (American Medical Association). 2019b. “Proceedings of the 2019 Annual Meeting of the House of Delegates.” Approved November 17. www.ama-assn.org/house-delegates/annual-meeting/proceedings-2019-annual-meeting-house-delegates.

4. AMA (American Medical Association). 2020. “Constitution and Bylaws.” January. www.ama-assn.org/system/files/2019-12/ama-constitution-and-bylaws.pdf.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3