Abstract
Abstract
As a contemporary concept, heritage bridges legal discourse and ethical discourse, national affiliations and a global imaginary, colonial pasts and neocolonial presents. The term often circulates beliefs in cultural authenticity, collective memory, and historical merit under the logic of neoliberal markets and legitimate capital gain, hence the tight connections between cultural heritage, industry, and tourism. While the concept developed as early as the nineteenth century in postrevolutionary France, its expansive political, juridical, and symbolic use has matured only after the Second World War, primarily as a reaction to the mass destruction experienced in European cities. Managing “heritage” in the context of the global political imagination created after the war, UNESCO has become the key player, lead actor, and sole orchestrator of all things/sites/memories—tangible and intangible—defined as World Cultural Heritage. This article looks at recent critical engagement with heritage, and with UNESCO's role in identifying heritage sites, by exploring Refugee Heritage, a recent project of DAAR (Decolonizing Architecture Art Residency).
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Development,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference29 articles.
1. The Scope and Definitions of Heritage: From Tangible to Intangible;Ahmad;International Journal of Heritage Studies,2006
2. The EU and the Recycling of Colonialism: Formation of Europeans through Intercultural Dialogue;Aman;Educational Philosophy and Theory,2012
3. Amiry
Suad
. “Our Story.” Riwaq. www.riwaq.org/our-story (accessed April10, 2018).
4. Cultural Heritage Misfits: Perspectives from Developing Worlds;Arantes
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献