The Comparability of Perceived Physical and Mental Health Measures Across Immigrants and Natives in the United States

Author:

Maskileyson Dina1ORCID,Seddig Daniel1ORCID,Davidov Eldad12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Cologne, Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, Institute of Sociology and Social Psychology, Cologne, Germany

2. Department of Sociology, and URPP Social Networks, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract The comparative study of perceived physical and mental health in general—and the comparative study of health between the native-born and immigrants, in particular—requires that the groups understand survey questions inquiring about their health in the same way and display similar response patterns. After all, observed differences in perceived health may not reflect true differences but rather cultural bias in the health measures. Research on cross-country measurement equivalence between immigrants and natives on self-reported health measures has received very limited attention to date, resulting in a growing demand for the validation of existing perceived health measures using samples of natives and immigrants and establishing measurement equivalence of health-related assessment tools. This study, therefore, aims to examine measurement equivalence of self-reported physical and mental health indicators between immigrants and natives in the United States. Using pooled data from the 2015–2017 IPUMS Health Surveys, we examine the cross-group measurement equivalence properties of five concepts that are measured by multiple indicators: (1) perceived limitations in activities of daily life; (2) self-reported disability; (3) perceived functional limitations; (4) perceived financial stress; and (5) nonspecific psychological distress. Furthermore, we examine the comparability of these data among respondents of different ethnoracial origins and from different regions of birth, who report few versus many years since migration, their age, gender, and the language used to respond to the interview (e.g., English vs. Spanish). We test for measurement equivalence using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. The results reveal that health scales are comparable across the examined groups. This finding allows drawing meaningful conclusions about similarities and differences among natives and immigrants on measures of perceived health in these data.

Publisher

Duke University Press

Subject

Demography

Reference57 articles.

1. Acculturation and cancer screening among Latinas: Results from the National Health Interview Survey;Abraído-Lanza;Annals of Behavioral Medicine,2005

2. Dietary assimilation and health among Hispanic immigrants to the United States;Akresh;Journal of Health and Social Behavior,2007

3. Asparouhov T. , & MuthénB. (2010a). Simple second order chi-square correction (Mplus Version 6, technical appendix). Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/WLSMV_new_chi21.pdf

4. Asparouhov T. , & MuthénB. (2010b). Weighted least squares estimation with missing data (Mplus Technical Appendix, 2010). Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/GstrucMissingRevision.pdf

5. Mortality differences between the foreign-born and locally-born population in France (2004–2007);Boulogne;Social Science & Medicine,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3