Abstract
This survey is a witness report of what is happening in the community of historians of econometrics. This survey is a follow-up of an earlier survey which investigated who was active in the history of econometrics. The conclusion of the earlier survey was that interest in the history of econometrics has arisen primarily from within econometrics itself and that its stories have been written mainly by econometricians. The conclusion of the current survey is that econometrics as a discipline remains of interest only to the econometricians but that the artifacts created by econometricians have caught the attention of historians of science.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,History
Reference75 articles.
1. Bank Behavior in Large-Scale Macroeconometric Models of the 1960s;Acosta,2019
2. The Ordinary Business of Macroeconometric Modeling: Working on the Fed-MIT-Penn Model, 1964–74;Backhouse,2019
3. Frisch’s Econometric Laboratory and the Rise of Trygve Haavelmo’s Probability Approach;Bjerkholt;Econometric Theory,2005
4. Writing ‘The Probability Approach’ with Nowhere to Go: Haavelmo in the United States, 1939–1944;Bjerkholt;Econometric Theory,2007
5. Ragnar Frisch’s Business Cycle Approach: The Genesis of the Propagation and Impulse Model;Bjerkholt;European Journal of the History of Economic Thought,2007
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献