Critical assessment of smart calculation-based spectroscopy versus chemometric-assisted methods: Application to combined antibiotic formulations
-
Published:2022-06-30
Issue:2
Volume:13
Page:214-223
-
ISSN:2153-2257
-
Container-title:European Journal of Chemistry
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur J Chem
Author:
Abdullatif Hind Ali1ORCID, Michael Adel Magdy1ORCID, Trabik Yossra Ahmed2ORCID, Ayad Miriam Farid2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ahram Canadian University, Cairo,12573, Egypt 2. Department of Pharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11571, Egypt
Abstract
This work describes a comparative study of two multivariate chemometric and univariate spectrophotometric methods for the determination of a ternary drug mixture containing oxytetracycline HCl, bromhexine HCl, and lidocaine HCl. All methods show high sensitivity and similar linearity range. Meanwhile, the chemometric method has the advantage of higher accuracy, higher specificity and better regression parameters. The two spectrophotometric methods are constant multiplication coupled with spectrum subtraction and successive ratio subtraction coupled with spectrum subtraction while the chemometric method used partial least square and principal component regression models. In addition, a spiking technique was used to increase the concentration of bromhexine HCl in the dosage form, allowing its determination despite its low contribution. Methods were successfully applied in the dosage form Oxyclear® veterinary injection in pure powder as well as in its pharmaceutical formulation. Statistical comparison showed no significant difference between the developed methods and the reference method.
Publisher
European Journal of Chemistry
Reference32 articles.
1. [1]. He, Y.; Yang, X.; Xia, J.; Zhao, L.; Yang, Y. Consumption of meat and dairy products in China: a review. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2016, 75, 385-391. 2. [2]. Perry, B. D.; Randolph, T. F.; McDermott, J. J.; Sones, K. R.; Thornton, P. K. Investing in animal health research to alleviate poverty. Nairobi: ILRI, 2002. 3. [3]. Krčméry, V.; Grúnertová, H. On the mechanism of action of tetracycline antibiotics: V. The effect of oxytetracycline on the reduction of triphenyltetrazolium by staphylococci and some other microorganisms. Folia Microbiol. (Praha) 1964, 9, 222-231. 4. [4]. Wheeler, D. L.; Barrett, T.; Benson, D. A.; Bryant, S. H.; Canese, K.; Chetvernin, V.; Church, D. M.; DiCuccio, M.; Edgar, R.; Federhen, S.; Feolo, M.; Geer, L. Y.; Helmberg, W.; Kapustin, Y.; Khovayko, O.; Landsman, D.; Lipman, D. J.; Madden, T. L.; Maglott, D. R.; Miller, V.; Ostell, J.; Pruitt, K. D.; Schuler, G. D.; Shumway, M.; Sequeira, E.; Sherry, S. T.; Sirotkin, K.; Souvorov, A.; Starchenko, G.; Tatusov, R. L.; Tatusova, T. A.; Wagner, L.; Yaschenko, E. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 36, D13-D21. 5. [5]. Cartwright, A. The British pharmacopoeia, 1864 to 2014 medicines, international standards and the state; Routledge: London, England, 2016.
|
|