Affiliation:
1. Sungkyunkwan University, South Korea
2. Leiden University, the Netherlands
Abstract
Since old-age programmes mitigate life-course risks that are relevant to individuals across socio-economic groups in ageing societies, all parties have a political incentive to support these initiatives. Nevertheless, pre-existing partisan commitments bind the policy instruments that parties use. Cabinet-level analyses of OECD economies demonstrate that left incumbency relies more on public expenditure than right-wing governments. What is more important is that, in the context of large elderly populations, pension coverage is greater under right-leaning governments, while pension replacement rates are higher in left-leaning governments. This shows that party behaviour related to life course-related policies cannot be explained by the conventional pro-expansion versus the pro-retrenchment partisan politics. Rather, a focus on partisan variation in the use of policy instruments is required.1
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference81 articles.
1. Reconsidering seniority bias: aging, internal institutions, and union support for pension reform;Anderson, K.M.,2007
2. Social democracy, unions, and pension politics in Germany and Sweden;Anderson, K.M.,2003
3. Polarization and policy: the politics of public-sector pensions;Anzia, S.F.,2017
4. Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2013;Armingeon, K.,2015
5. The effects of political competition on the generosity of public-sector pension plans;Bagchi, S.,2019
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献