Non-profit administrative advocacy: anti-violence non-profit organisations and their relations with state agencies in Russia

Author:

Davidenko Maria1,Iarskaia-Smirnova Elena2

Affiliation:

1. Independent scholar, Australia

2. HSE University, Russia and European Humanities University, Lithuania

Abstract

Research on non-profit organisations’ (NPOs’) administrative advocacy suggests that while restrictive regulatory legislation hinders their activities, ambiguous state policy on particular social issues provides opportunities to advance their agenda. To better understand how non-profits conduct their administrative advocacy in a context characterised by both restrictive regulatory legislation and state policy ambiguity, this article examines Russian NPOs that are dealing with the contested issue of domestic violence. Drawing on network governance theory, the study investigates how these organisations navigated this complex terrain of restrictions and opportunities. It finds that anti-violence NPOs employed collaborative tactics to engage staff of state agencies who directly interact with citizens, while facing the risk of state-sanctioned repressions due to the potential classification of their work as political. By considering a case of administrative advocacy in a contentious policy field, this article argues for the need to account for the broader political context when researching non-profit advocacy.

Publisher

Bristol University Press

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference59 articles.

1. Encouraged but controlled: governance networks in Russian regions;Aasland, A.,2016

2. Between collaboration and subordination: state and non-state actors in Russian anti-drug policy;Aasland, A.,2020

3. Discretion on the frontline: the street level bureaucrat in English statutory homelessness services;Alden, S.,2015

4. Nasilie v Otnoshenii Zhenshchin v Rossiyskoi Federatsii: Pravovoi Analiz Situatsii;Antonova, Y.A.,2016

5. Advocacy compromised: how financial, organizational and institutional factors shape advocacy strategies of civil society organizations;Arvidson, M.,2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3