Does moving to paid work make me a better mum? Mismatches between political and social ideologies of ‘good motherhood’ and that of lone mothers in the UK

Author:

Jun Miyang1

Affiliation:

1. Yonsei University, South Korea

Abstract

The current design of UK public policy and mainstream political and social discourse has consistently equated paid work with good citizenship and desirable parenting. The article presents findings from a recent qualitative study that explores how lone mothers with different moral rationalities judge themselves before and after making a transition from welfare (and being full-time carers) to paid work. The findings suggest that the design of public policy and related discourses worked well with the moral rationalities of some lone mothers who believed that paid work made them better mothers. However, it left others with moral values on direct care behind, as they suffered from physical and emotional exhaustion and feelings of guilt in paid work. The article highlights how dominant ideologies reinforce the pre-existing hierarchy of paid work and care, with the latter being viewed as deserving of less acknowledgement.

Publisher

Bristol University Press

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference69 articles.

1. Approaches to Social Enquiry: Advancing Knowledge;Blaikie, N.,2007

2. Responsibilising recovery: lone and low-paid parents, universal credit and the gendered contradictions of UK welfare reform;Cain, R.,2016

3. Speech on the Big Society, Cabinet Office, Prime Minister’s Office, 10 Downing Street and The Rt Hon David Cameron MP: 15 February 2011;Cameron, D.,2011

4. The co-construction of shame in the context of poverty: beyond a threat to the social bond;Chase, E.,2013

5. Extensive mothering: employed mothers’ constructions of the good mother;Christopher, K.,2012

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pro-poor sustainable development;Journal of Poverty and Social Justice;2023-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3