A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study of Speech in Five-Year-Olds with Cleft Palate ± Lip to Support Development of National Audit Standards

Author:

Britton Lorraine1,Albery Liz2,Bowden Melanie3,Harding-Bell Anne4,Phippen Ginette5,Sell Debbie6

Affiliation:

1. Trent Regional Cleft Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

2. North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.

3. North West of England, Isle of Man and North Wales Cleft Network, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, United Kingdom.

4. East of England Cleft Lip and Palate Network, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and Module Coordinator, Post Graduate Certificate in Cleft Palate Studies, Department of Human Communication Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

5. The Spires Cleft Centre, Salisbury and Oxford, United Kingdom.

6. Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Objective To develop national standards for speech outcomes and processes of care for children with cleft palate ± lip and to test the standards using national data. Design, Setting, and Participants In this large, multicenter, prospective cohort study, speech recordings of 1110 five-year-olds with cleft palate involvement (born 2001 to 2003) were collected by 12 cleft centers in Great Britain and Ireland. Recordings were analyzed by consensus by specialist speech and language therapists using the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented. Results were benchmarked against evidence-based process and speech outcome standards and statistical analysis undertaken. Results From the 1110 children audited, 48% (530) had speech within the normal range. This was not significantly different from the agreed standard of 50% ( P = .20, CI = 45–50%). Sixty-six percent (734) had speech with no evidence of structurally related speech problems or history of speech-related secondary surgery. This was significantly below the standard of 70% ( P =.007, CI = 62–69%). Sixty percent (666) had no serious cleft-related articulation errors. This was significantly better than the agreed standard of 50% ( P < .001, CI = 67–73%). More than 80% of 2-year-olds received a specialist speech and language assessment against a benchmark of 100%. Conclusions Developing standards has facilitated more meaningful reporting of speech outcomes and treatment processes. Evidence-based standards were defined and extensively tested, enabling centers to compare their performance with national trends. One 5-year outcome standard was achievable; the other two standards will require modification through the mandatory annual national audit program.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Oral Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3