Abstract
Purpose – to assess the integration and management of the formation and implementation of the competitive advantages of the Visegrad Four countries in the European market of information, computer, telecommunication (ICT) services based on their analysis in the individual market segments.
Design/Method/Research approach - this study aims to determine the presence and nature of the competitive advantages of countries in the European ICT services market based on the calculation of export specialization indicators, to establish factors for their growth and effective implementation based on the results of structural, regressive, comparative analysis and synthesis.
Findings. It has been suggested that the introduction of the European rules for market organization stimulated the building-up in the Visegrad Four countries of their competitive advantages in the European ICT services market through innovative investment resources, effective management of private, public sector and international investors and personnel.
Practical implications. The accession of Eastern European countries to the European digital market and digital space requires a generalization of the experience of the Visegrad four countries and the identification of factors, directions and priorities of the national policy for the development of the ICT sector.
Originality/Value. Scientific novelty of the study - based on the calculation of the comparative advantage index, different integration and effectiveness of managing the competitive advantages of the Visegrad Four countries, primarily the sphere of IC services to the European market (relatively high - in the Czech Republic due to state financing, moderate – in Poland due to financial support from the state, in Slovakia due to private investment in R&D, low – in Hungary), this situation requires a balanced innovation and investment strategy of the countries in the future, the training of a sufficient number of qualified IT specialists, stimulation of private investment in R&D and business cooperation with the sphere of knowledge by means of tax and administrative incentives, facilitating the transition of small and medium-sized businesses on the principles of economics 4.0.
Paper type – empirical.
Publisher
Oles Honchar Dnipropetrovsk National University
Reference25 articles.
1. Balassa, B. (1965). Trade Liberalisation and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage. The Manchester School, 33(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x.
2. Bočková, N. (2013). Visegrad Four countries: evaluation in R&D sectors of performance. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(4), 873–880. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361040873.
3. Capik, P., & Drahokoupil, J. (2011). Foreign direct investments in business services: transforming the Visegrád four region into a knowledge-based economy? Journal European Planning Studies, 19(9), 1611-1631. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.586181.
4. Dzyad, O., Krasnikova, N., Hrechyn K. (2019). Konkurentni perevahy krayin Vyshehradsʹkoyi hrupy na vnutrishnʹomu yevropeysʹkomu rynku silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkykh tovariv [Competitive Advantages of the Visegrad Countries on the European Internal Agricultural Market]. Infrastruktura rynka [Market Infrastructure], 31, 19-27. Retrieved from http://market-infr.od.ua/journals/2019/31_2019_ukr/5.pdf (in Ukrainian).
5. European Commission (2015). Why we need a Digital Single Market – Factsheet. Publications Office of the EU. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publications/why-we-need-digital-single-market_en.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献