Affiliation:
1. Riga Tehnical University
Abstract
In software development projects, managers still have to face a variety of organisational and technical limitations despite the development of technology and approaches to improve the project management process. Projects, Human Resources and Costs are planned for a specific period of time. However, in the progression of project execution, there is a need to make various decisions and to dynamically adjust the work plan during the project in order to conform to its evolution. Thus, there is a need for a method that employs the latest technology to support the project management decision-making process.
The aim and the expected result of the article are to identify and collect available information in the scientific literature to answer the following questions: (1) Which challenges of project management have been addressed using genetic algorithms? (2) What are the opportunities and limitations of genetic algorithms in the project management decision-making process? (3) What are the potential solutions to the identified genetic algorithm problems?
Publisher
Riga Technical University
Reference46 articles.
1. 1] Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)-Sixth Edition. Project Management Institute, 2017. [Online] Available: https://www.pmi.org/pmbok-guidestandards [Accessed: September 26, 2019].
2. [2] M. Karova and N. Avramova, “A genetic algorithm basic approach for software management project,” Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies - CompSysTech ’12, pp. 103–110, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1145/2383276.2383293
3. [3] S.-J. Huang, N.-H. Chiu, and L.-W. Chen, “Integration of the grey relational analysis with genetic algorithm for software effort estimation,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 188, no. 3, pp. 898–909, Aug. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.07.002
4. [4] Y, Zhou and Y. Chen, "Business process assignment optimization, " IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Yasmine, vol. 3 Hammamet, Tunisia, 2002, pp. 6. [Online] Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/1176100 [Accessed: September 26, 2019].
5. [5] A. Agarwal, S. Colak, and S. Erenguc, “A Neurogenetic approach for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem,” Comput. Oper. Res., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 44–50, Jan. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2010.01.007