Asphalt Pavement Compaction Control: Relevance of Laboratory and Non-Destructive Testing Methods of Density
-
Published:2022-03-28
Issue:1
Volume:17
Page:143-166
-
ISSN:1822-427X
-
Container-title:The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:BJRBE
Author:
Baltrušaitis Andrius1ORCID, Vaitkus Audrius2ORCID, Židanavičiūtė Jurgita2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Roads, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania 2. Road Research Institute, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania
Abstract
Assurance of asphalt pavement layer compaction, expressed by air voids ratio between field and laboratory bulk density, is one of the main criteria of the asphalt pavement durability. Thus, destructive measures should be applied, and many asphalt samples should be taken on site in order to determine the representative compaction level of constructed pavement. With the fast development of technologies, new methods should be considered for fast, non-destructive and accurate determination of asphalt bulk density on site. As there are quite few non-destructive methods related to asphalt pavement density measurement, there is a need to make comparison of such methods. Currently, when GPR methods are used to determine the density, calibration cores are used in all cases to estimate the unknown or unmeasured variables or conditions that may affect the results of dielectric value measurements. The aim of this study is to develop a regression model that can predict the bulk density of the compacted asphalt layer without coring, using the design values of the bulk density determined in the type tests of asphalt mixtures or other currently used non-destructive testing technologies (in this case PQI and NDG) and GPR measured dielectric constant values.
Publisher
Riga Technical University
Subject
Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference41 articles.
1. Al-Qadi, I. L., Leng, Z., Lahouar, S., and Baek J. (2011). In-place hot-mix asphalt density estimation using ground-penetrating radar. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2152(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.3141/2152-03 2. Ameri, M., Novin, M. K., and Yousefi, B. (2014). Comparison of the field measurements of asphalt concrete densities obtained by ground-penetrating radar, pavement quality indicator and the borehole coring methods. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 15(4), 759–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2014.909874 3. Baltrušaitis, A., Vaitkus A., and Smirnovs, J. (2020). Asphalt layer density and air voids content: GPR and laboratory testing data reliance. Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 15(3), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2020-15.486 4. Berthelot, C., Taylor, B., Stuber, E., Podborochynski, D., Haichert, R., Marjerison, B., and Bushman, R. (2009). Ground penetrating radar quality assurance characterization of asphaltic concrete surfacing. http://conf.tac-atc.ca/english/ resourcecentre/readingroom/conference/conf2009/pdf/Berthelot2.pdf 5. Braunfelds, J., Senkans, U., Skels, P., Janeliukstis, R., Salgals, T., Redka, D., Lyashuk, I., Porins, J., Spolitis, S., Haritonovs, V., and Bobrovs, V. (2021). FBG-based sensing for structural health monitoring of road infrastructure. Journal of Sensors, 2021, Article 8850368. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8850368
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|