Effectiveness of Light Sources on In-Office Dental Bleaching: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

Author:

SoutoMaior JR,de Moraes SLD1,Lemos CAA2,Vasconcelos BC do E3,Montes MAJR4,Pellizzer EP5

Affiliation:

1. Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes, DDS, MS, PhD, adjunct professor, School of Dentistry, Pernambuco University (UPE), Camaragibe, Pernambuco, Brazil

2. Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos, DDS, MS, PhD student, Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State Univeristy (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil

3. Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito Vasconcelos, DDS, MS, PhD, associate professor, School of Dentistry, Pernambuco University (UPE), Camaragibe, Pernambuco, Brazil

4. Marcos Antônio Japiassú Rezende Montes, DDS, MS, PhD, associate professor, Restorative Dentistry, Pernambuco University (UPE), Camaragibe, Pernambuco, Brazil

5. Eduardo Piza Pellizzer, DDS, MS, PhD, full professor, Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State Univeristy (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

SUMMARY Objective: A systematic review and meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the efficacy of tooth color change and sensitivity of teeth following in-office bleaching with and without light gel activation in adult patients. Methods: This review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD 42017060574) and is based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Electronic systematic searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were conducted for published articles. Only randomized clinical trials among adults that compared in-office bleaching with and without light activation with the same bleaching gel concentrations were selected. The outcomes were tooth color change and tooth sensitivity prevalence and intensity. Results: Twenty-three articles from 1054 data sources met the eligibility criteria. After title and abstract screening, 39 studies remained. Sixteen studies were further excluded. Twenty-three studies remained for qualitative analyses and 20 for meta-analyses of primary and secondary outcomes. No significant differences in tooth color change or tooth sensitivity incidence were found between the compared groups; however, tooth sensitivity intensity decreased when light sources were applied. Conclusion: The use of light sources for in-office bleaching is not imperative to achieve esthetic clinical results.

Publisher

Operative Dentistry

Subject

General Dentistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3