Relationship Between Euthanasia and the Patient’s Right to Self-Determination

Author:

AŞKIN Uğur1,YEĞRİM Korhan2

Affiliation:

1. İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HUKUK FAKÜLTESİ

2. İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, HUKUK FAKÜLTESİ, HUKUK PR.

Abstract

The concept of euthanasia, which is formed by combining the words goods and death, means sweet and painless death, easy death. Legal definition of euthanasia is the death of the person whose death is inevitable and who cannot be cured according to the data of medical science or who is in unbearable pain, based on his consent, or leaving the medical aid to die by cutting it off. The patient’s right to determine his own future, on the other hand, means that a patient who has the opportunity and will to make his own decision uses his own life choices voluntarily. With this right, the patient can choose not only what is best for him, but also a situation that is contrary to his interests. In order for this right to be exercised in the best way, the patient must know exactly the processes related to treatment. Although euthanasia and the patient’s right to self-determination seem to be similar rights in terms of purpose, they contain various differences. In fact, euthanasia is a type of right included in the patient’s right to self-determination. In this context, euthanasia includes the termination of life and the denial of treatment necessary for life. On the other hand, the right to self-determination requires the patient to have a decisive and preliminary character in all treatment attempts. In this study, the relationship between euthanasia and the patient’s right to self-determination will be examined in recognition of doctrine and comparative law, and certain criteria will be put forward.

Publisher

Turkiye Adalet Akademisi

Reference49 articles.

1. Akbulut, Berrin, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Ankara 2020.

2. Altunkaş, Aysun, Ötanazinin Türleri ve Ötanazinin Türk Ceza Hukuku Bakımından Değerlendirilmesi, III. Sağlık Hukuku Kendi Geleceğini Belirleme Hakkı ve Ötanazi Sempozyumu, Ankara 2016.

3. Artuk, M. Emin; Gökcen, Ahmet; Alşahin, M. Emin; Çakır, Kerim, Ceza Hukuku Özel Hükümler, Ankara 2021.

4. Artuk, M. Emin; Gökcen, Ahmet; Alşahin, M. Emin; Çakır, Kerim, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Ankara 2020.

5. Artuk, M. Emin, Yenidünya, A. Caner, Ötenazi, Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt:7, Sayı:1-3, 1992-1993.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3