RECIST 1.1 AND irRC FOR RESPONSE ASSESMENT IN PATIENTS WITH DISSEMINATED CUTANEOUS MELANOMA TREATED WITH IPILIMUMAB OR DENDRITIC CELL VACCINE

Author:

Novik A. V.1,Yaremenko E. V.2ORCID,Anokhina E. M.3,Nehaeva T. L.3ORCID,Semenova A. I.3,Latipova D. Kh.3,Protsenko S. A.3,Baldueva I. A.4

Affiliation:

1. N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Centre of Oncology, Ministry of health of Russian Federation; Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

2. Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

3. N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Centre of Oncology, Ministry of health of Russian Federation

4. N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Centre of Oncology, Ministry of health of Russian Federation; I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University

Abstract

Special systems were developed for response assessment of immunooncology drugs. The role and benefits of particular system in assessing the efficacy of different immunotherapy methods are not clear yet. The objective of this study is to compare the responses on ipilimab (IPI) or dendritic cell vaccines (DCV) therapy by RECIST 1.1 and irRC criteria. Eighty two patients with unresectable disseminated or locally advanced stage III-IV melanoma were included. Fifty-five patients were treated with IPI and 27 – with DCV at the N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology from 2007 to 2016. Response by each system was compared to overall survival (OS). Response by both systems was a good marker for OS in IPI group (p=0,0001 for both systems) but not in DCV group (p=0,357 for RECIST and p=0,411 for irRC). Discrepancies in responses by different systems were detected in 5 patients in the IPI group and in 5 patients in the DCV group (p>0.05). The median of OS in IPI patients with PD by both systems was 8.8 mo. In case of mixed responses, (RECIST progression disease (PD) and irRC stable disease) OS in IPI group was 29.1+ mo, 16.7 mo. In the case of SD by RECIST and PD by irRC OS was 11.6+ mo. One patient with PD by RECIST and partial response by irRC lived 16.3 mo. OS in DCV group was 9.5+, 8.7, 15.3, 29.7 mo. in patients with mixed responses (PD+SD); 15,7 mo. in patient with SD by RECIST and PR by irRC. There was a trend to better overall survival of patients with PD according to the RECIST 1.1 and the absence of PD by irRC system in comparison with the PD by both systems in the treatment of IPI was revealed. In the DCV group the same pattern wasn’t found. Thus, both the RECIST 1.1 system and the irRC system are good surrogate markers for the overall survival. SD in patients receiving DCV cannot be considered a good response to therapy, since it does not improve the OS in comparison with patients who has PD by the same system. The irRC system allows to extract a subgroup of patients with better overall survival from patients with PD by RECIST among those who receive IPI but not DCV for systemic therapy of melanoma.

Publisher

Tomsk Cancer Research Institute

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3