Origin and emplacement of the Blue Diamond landslide breccia, southern Nevada, U.S.A.
Author:
Ferry Nicholas1, Sturmer Daniel1, Ward Dylan1, Taylor Wanda2, Brett Carlton1
Affiliation:
1. 1 Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, U.S.A. 2. 2 Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, U.S.A.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Landslide deposits are common in basin fill of tectonically active areas, including the Basin and Range province of western North America. However, interpreting and reconstructing ancient landsliding events from these deposits is challenging, but can be aided by detailed field analysis. Remnants of the Blue Diamond landslide breccia are exposed capping hills and ridges in the foothills of the eastern Spring Mountains near Blue Diamond, Nevada, USA. Uncertainties surrounding the origin and emplacement of the ancestral Blue Diamond landslide have emerged based on the disparate distribution of landslide outcrops. Therefore, in this study we used detailed sedimentological data and observations to interpret a two-phase emplacement history for the Blue Diamond landslide.
Sedimentological observations are consistent with Blue Diamond landslide breccia emplacement as a rock avalanche. The presence of clastic dikes and flame structures and negligible incorporation of bedrock substrate material suggest that runout occurred over a saturated substrate. Flow transformation into a debris avalanche is ruled out because clast-count data show that debris entrainment was not sufficient to act as the sole mechanism behind the excessive mobility experienced by the Blue Diamond landslide. Instead, we propose that the excessive mobility was driven by flow entrainment of large Aztec Sandstone boulders and interaction with a saturated runout path substrate that caused a reduced basal frictional resistance, enabling initial emplacement onto Blue Diamond Hill. We therefore suggest that the Blue Diamond landslide was derived from a source area about 8.5 km northwest of the Blue Diamond townsite and flowed into the Blue Diamond Hill site where it was emplaced onto Moenkopi Formation atop the hill during the Miocene. Due to loading by this new overburden, incompetent gypsum horizons failed in the upper Kaibab Formation stratigraphically below the Moenkopi Formation. These failed gypsum horizons then served as a compound landslide rupture surface, transporting the overlying Moenkopi Formation and landslide breccia. This secondary emplacement likely ceased by late Miocene to Pliocene time.
Publisher
Society for Sedimentary Geology
Reference72 articles.
1. Aaron,
J.,
and
McDougall,S.,
2019,
Rock avalanche mobility: the role of path material:
Engineering Geology,
v.257,
no.105126. 2. Abele,
G.,
1997,
Rockslide movement supported by the mobilization of groundwater-saturated valley floor sediments:
Zeischrift für Geomorphologie,
v.41,
p.1–
20. 3. Abolins,
M.J.,
1999,
I, Stratigraphic constraints on the number of discrete Neoproterozoic glaciations and the relationship between glaciation and Ediacaren evolution, and II, The Kwichup thrust in the northwestern Spring Mountains, Nevada: implications for large-magnitude extension and the structure of the Cordilleran thrust belt [Ph.D.
thesis]:
Pasadena, California Institute of Technology,
144p. 4. Aharonov,
E.,
and
Anders,M.H.,
2006,
Hot water: a possible solution to the Heart Mountain detachment problem?:
Geology,
v.36,
p.165–
168. 5. Anders,
M.H.,
Christie-Blick,
N.,
and
Walker,C.D.,
2006,
Distinguishing between rooted and rootless detachments: a case study from the Mormon Mountains of southeastern Nevada:
Geology,
v.114,
p.645–
664.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|