Stratigraphic analysis of XES02: Implications for the sequence stratigraphic paradigm
Author:
Prather Bradford E.12, Falivene Oriol3, Burgess Peter M.4
Affiliation:
1. 1 Department of Geology, 1414 Naismith Drive, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, U.S.A. 2. 2 CarTerra, LLC, 715 Knox Street, Houston, Texas 77007, U.S.A. 3. 3 Shell International Exploration and Production, 3333 Highway 6 South, Houston, Texas 77082, U.S.A. 4. 4 School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Jane Herdman Building, Liverpool, L69 3GP, U.K.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Sequence stratigraphy has the potential to provide a consistent method for integrating data, correlating strata, defining stratigraphic evolution, and generating quantifiable predictions. However, the consistent application requires a precise definition of concepts, stratigraphic units, bounding surfaces, and workflow. Currently no single generally accepted approach to sequence stratigraphic analysis exists, nor are there any robust tests of models and methods. Applying conventional sequence stratigraphic analysis to strata from an analog laboratory experiment (eXperimental EarthScape02, XES02) with known boundary conditions and chronology provides some initial robust testing of the models and methods. Despite stratigraphic architectures apparently consistent with those expected within the sequence stratigraphic paradigm, blind-test applications yield: 1) deducted erroneous base-level curves, 2) systems-tract classification mismatches, 3) disconnected systems-tracts type and actual base level, 4) time-transgressive basin-floor fans, and 5) missing systems tracts. Stratigraphic forward models using base-level curves derived from Wheeler diagrams cannot match the timing, redeposited-sediment volume, and depositional environments observed in the XES02 experiment. These mismatches result from common Wheeler diagram construction practice, producing poorly resolved base-level minima timing and base-level fall durations, hence inaccurate fall rates. Consequently, reconstructions of controlling factors based on stratal architectures remain uncertain, making predictions similarly uncertain. A reasonable path forward is to properly acknowledge these uncertainties while performing stratigraphic analysis and to address them through multiple scenario analysis and modeling.
Publisher
Society for Sedimentary Geology
Reference109 articles.
1. Aali,
M.,
Richards,
B.,
Nedimović,
M.R.,
Maselli,
V.,
and
Gibling,M.R.,
2021,
Geometrical Breakdown Approach to interpretation of depositional sequences: Geosphere, doi:10.1130/ges02371.1. 2. Ager,
D.V.,
1973,
The Nature of the Stratigraphical Record:
New York,
John Wiley,
151p. 3. Ager,
D.V.,
1993,
The New Catastrophism:
Cambridge University Press,
231p. 4. Badalini,
G.,
Kneller,
B.,
and
Winker,C.D.,
2000,
Architecture and process in the late Pleistocene Trinity–Brazos turbidite system, Gulf of Mexico, inWeimer,P.,Slatt,R.M.,Coleman,J.,Rosen,N.C.,Nelson,H.,Bouma,A.H.,Styzen,M.J., and
Lawrence,D.T.,eds.,
Deep-Water Reservoirs of the World: SEPM, Gulf Coast Section, 20th Annual Bob F. Perkins Research Conference,
p.16–34, doi:10.5724/gcs.00.15.0016. 5. Bailey,
L.P.,
Clare,
M.A.,
Rosenberger,
K.J.,
Cartigny,
M.J.B.,
Talling,
P.J.,
Paull,
C.K.,
Gwiazda,
R.,
Parsons,
D.R.,
Simmons,
S.M.,
Xu,
J.,
Haigh,
I.D.,
Maier,
K.L.,
McGann,
M.,
and
Lundsten,E.,
2021,
Preconditioning by sediment accumulation can produce powerful turbidity currents without major external triggers:
Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 562,
116845, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2021.116845.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|