UNLOCKING THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE COLONIZATION WINDOW: ICHNOFABRICS FROM UPPER CRETACEOUS TIDE-INFLUENCED MEANDER-LOOP DEPOSITS
Author:
DÍEZ-CANSECO DAVINIA1, BUATOIS LUIS A.2, MÁNGANO M. GABRIELA2, CUEVAS-GONZÁLEZ JAIME1, BENITO M. ISABEL3
Affiliation:
1. 1 Universidad de Alicante, Departamento de Ciencias de la Tierra y del Medio Ambiente, Carretera San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, E-03690, Spain 2. 2 University of Saskatchewan, Department of Geological Sciences, 114 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2, Canada 3. 3 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Departamento de Geodinámica, Estratigrafía y Paleontología, Instituto de GeoCiencias (IGEO-CSIC), Jose Antonio Novais 12, Madrid, E-28040, Spain
Abstract
ABSTRACTStudies dealing with the colonization window typically emphasize two major features: duration (short term vs. long term) and frequency of colonization (episodic vs. continuous). However, our understanding of tide-influenced meander loops requires consideration of an additional feature, the architecture of the colonization window, which comprises not only the spatial dimension and geometry of the colonization surface, but also its evolution through time. Tide-influenced meander-loop systems show a heterogeneous trace-fossil distribution that reflects the variety of processes operating along the point-bar and overbank colonization surfaces. Ichnofabric analysis of tide-influenced meander-loop deposits from the Upper Cretaceous Tremp Formation (Pyrenees, Spain) provides valuable insights into the sedimentary and ichnological dynamics of these marginal-marine systems and allows the importance of stratal geometry controlling the colonization window to be evaluated. Six ichnofabrics are identified in point bars and associated overbank deposits. These ichnofabrics differ in bioturbation index (e.g., higher in the upper part than the lower-middle parts of point bars), preservation of primary sedimentary fabric (typically preserved in the lower-middle parts of point bars), inferred behavior and trophic types (e.g., dominance of dwelling or feeding structures in the lower-middle and upper parts of point bars, respectively), and other features such as depth of penetration, ichnotaxonomic composition, presence or absence of root trace fossils and/or mottling, or number of superimposed suites. The key environmental factor controlling the nature and distribution of ichnofabrics is the morphology of the point-bar lateral-accretion surfaces and their evolution through time. The architecture of the colonization window is here linked to the helicoidal flow and discharge changes in meandering channels, and the successive development of lateral accretion units with time.
Publisher
Society for Sedimentary Geology
Subject
Paleontology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference63 articles.
1. Bedatou, E., Melchor, R.N., Bellosi, E., and Genise,J.F., 2008, Crayfish burrows from Late Jurassic–Late Cretaceous continental deposits of Patagonia: Argentina. Their palaeoecological, palaeoclimatic and palaeobiogeographical significance: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v.257, p.169– 184. 2. Bockelie, J.F., 1994, Plant roots in core, inDonovanS.K.(ed.),The Palaeobiology of Trace Fossils: John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, West Sussex,308p. 3. Bromley, R.G., 1996, Trace fossils. Biology, Taphonomy and Applications (second edition): Chapman and Hall, London, 361p. 4. Buatois, L.A. and Mángano,M.G., 2004, Animal-substrate interactions in freshwater environments: applications of ichnology in facies and sequence stratigraphic analysis of fluvio-lacustrine successions, inMcIlroyD.(ed.),The Application of Ichnology to Palaeoenvironmental and Stratigraphic Analysis: Geological Society Special Publication 228, London, p.311– 333. 5. Buatois, L.A. and Mángano,M.G., 2011, Ichnology: Organism-Substrate Interactions in Space and Time: Cambridge University Press, New York, 358p.
|
|