1. For the difference between O'Connor and all other justices in the rate of voting to invalidate the regulation at issue (63% versus 52%), Z=2.599. For the difference between O'Connor and all other justices in the rate of voting for the result favoring state autonomy;Both of these differences of 11% are statistically significant at the P=.05 level
2. The Zscores are as follows: for O'Connor versus Stevens (77% versus 24%), Z=5.9297; for O'Connor versus Ginsburg (77% versus 22%), Z=6.2479; for O'Connor versus Souter (77% versus 28%), Z=5.3412; for O'Connor versus Breyer (77% versus 32%), Z=4.8048; for O'Connor versus Kennedy (77% versus 72%), Z=0.5450; for O'Connor versus Rehnquist (77% versus 67%), Z=1.0630; for O'Connor versus Scalia (77% versus 73%), Z=0.4386; and for O'Connor versus Thomas (77% versus 61%), Z=1.6661. of elementary and secondary school education); the effort to intervene in the Terri Schiavo saga;O'connor's Difference From;Ginsburg, Souter, and Breyer are statistically significant at the P=.05 level, while the remaining differences are not
3. removing jurisdiction from Florida state courts and providing federal court standing to parents of Schiavo against anyone withholding food or medical treatment necessary to sustain her life); and the Department of Justice's attempts to undercut California's legalization of medical marijuana in Gonzales v;Stat,2005
4. In Retrospect: A First Year Review of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005