1. available at -need website citation. The works of Marmor and Soames apply the concept of pragmatically enriched content to statutory interpretation, and other scholars have suggested that it has relevance to theories of constitutional interpretation. See Saul Cornell, The People's Constitution vs. the Lawyer's Constitution: Popular Constitutionalism and the Original Debate over Originalism;Scott Soames;Interpreting Legal Texts: What is, and What is not, Special About the Law,2007
2. Philosophical Foundations of Language in the Law
3. 2011) (explaining that linguistic content includes "the semantic content of the words and sentences used by a speaker (linguistic meaning), the assertive content of the speaker's utterance (what the speaker says, asserts, or stipulates by using those words in the context of utterance), [and] implicated content (which, though not asserted, is suggested or implied by the speaker's saying what he or she does in the context);Introduction, Philosophical Foundations of Language in the Law 8 (Scott Soames
4. Philosophical Foundations of Language in the Law